Re: [Tacos-devel] direct parameter

2006-04-12 Thread Michael Waluk
Thanks Andy,   I hadn't thought about the generated IDs.  I would still love to be able to do it (accepting the responsibility of explicitly naming things, etc.).  Or maybe we could call a listener on another page that won't take so long to render?  There is probably another problem with forwarding

[Tacos-devel] Re: Tacos setup issue

2006-04-12 Thread Joseph Hannon
Some good news! So, I decided to try another piece of the demo in my app and chose the EffectsExample. I pulled in the java, html and page files, adjusted the package settings, and it appears to work just like the demo app. I turned on debugging and all kinds of response comes back in the deb

Re: [Tacos-devel] Re: Tacos setup issue

2006-04-12 Thread andyhot
No, sitemap is not related. It should be friendly urls however. Jesse has mentioned that he has seen some issues with them + dojo. I think i had them enabled when i also saw this issue in my own server. We need to see if there's an easy way out of this however... >From Joseph Hannon <[EMAIL PROT

[Tacos-devel] Re: Tacos setup issue

2006-04-12 Thread Joseph Hannon
Good to know. The downloaded demo is great and is running on the same server I am developing on. I am using friendly URLs. Looks like the demo is not. I have very painstakingly compared the demo app to my app to see if I missed something. I am not using the sitemap piece. Not sure if that

Re: [Tacos-devel] direct parameter

2006-04-12 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I'm not planning on tackling it at all...Or, if I do it will be the last thing I think about. The tacos-like ResponseBuilder infrastructure should provide us enough of a protective layer that we can add it in when it's ready. (ie Howard had mentioned ideas on how to implement this, maybe he'll have

Re: [Tacos-devel] direct parameter

2006-04-12 Thread andyhot
>From Michael Waluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > It seems like DojoResponseBuilder's updateComponentsDirect method could be > changed to avoid calling render on unecessary components (it is doing so > with the NullWriter now). The problem is that if you don't call render on those 'unnecessary'

Re: [Tacos-devel] Re: Tacos setup issue

2006-04-12 Thread andyhot
I remember seeing similar behaviour, but i'm not sure why/when it is happenning. But dojo shouldn't be responsible for this... Does the inline edit box demo from http://demo.opennotion.com/tacos4/app work for you? Are you using friendly urls? >From Joseph Hannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am usin

Re: [Tacos-devel] direct parameter

2006-04-12 Thread Michael Waluk
Hi,   It seems like DojoResponseBuilder's updateComponentsDirect method could be changed to avoid calling render on unecessary components (it is doing so with the NullWriter now).  For example, if checkComponentContainers would return null for components that don't have PartialForBean containers it

[Tacos-devel] AjaxForm and updateComponents

2006-04-12 Thread Aj Gregory
I'm trying to hack up the portal I'm using so I can use tacos (beta2) with my tapestry (4.0.1) portlets... I've got something almost working but when I try to use an AjaxForm with updateComponents set to a component id it won't update the component after the ajax request is complete. Can any

[Tacos-devel] Re: Tacos setup issue

2006-04-12 Thread Joseph Hannon
I am using dojo from the demo app. I am using Firefox 1.5.0.1 on Linux and I tried IE on Win XP. Running Tomcat 5.5.7 on Linux. How would I make sure I am not caching the JS as you mention? It doesn't appear to be caching. I did add a debug line to dojo.js just before line 2017 printing th

Re: [Tacos-devel] response and ajax for file download

2006-04-12 Thread Andreas Andreou
What exactly do you want the Button in the ajaxform to do? As you say, the listener is triggered, so what is the problem? Ido M. Tamir wrote: >Hello, >I do have a problem with I think the Ajax stuff I sent in my >previous e-mail. >I changed the progressbar example a bit so an ajaxform with >an aj

Re: [Tacos-devel] Tacos setup issue

2006-04-12 Thread Andreas Andreou
did you also get dojo from the demo app? What browser are you using? Make sure it doesn't use old+cached javascript if you do update dojo Joseph Hannon wrote: > I am attempting to use Tacos 4 beta 2 and Tapestry 4.0.1 in my current > application. Wanted to test out the InlineEditBox. I copied

[Tacos-devel] Tacos setup issue

2006-04-12 Thread Joseph Hannon
I am attempting to use Tacos 4 beta 2 and Tapestry 4.0.1 in my current application. Wanted to test out the InlineEditBox. I copied the example page from the demo app. The text in the 'Sample Test' box finally shows as 'This is a block of sample text. --> is fun.' The statements in the debu

[Tacos-devel] response and ajax for file download

2006-04-12 Thread Ido M. Tamir
Hello, I do have a problem with I think the Ajax stuff I sent in my previous e-mail. I changed the progressbar example a bit so an ajaxform with an ajax submit button appears after the task is completed. Then I would like to serve data (that was created during the progressbar action) as a file. I

[Tacos-devel] InlineEditBox questions

2006-04-12 Thread Chris Chiappone
I have a situation in which the InlineEditBox component would be a nice feature to have in my page.  My page consists of a PartialFor component that builds a table of Objects.  One of the objects parameters is a notes field.  I would like to be able to inline edit this notes field.  When I've tried

[Tacos-devel] Irritating error message but it works

2006-04-12 Thread Ido M. Tamir
Hi, i used tacos4 beta 2 and tried to add a component to the progressbar. It works, my listener gets called when I press the button, but there is an irritating error message displayed: FATAL: bad srcObj for srcFunc: onclick can I ignore this? thank you very much ido ...