At 2009-12-22 02:07, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2009-12-21 11:01, Roy Wallace wrote:
... If you don't know where the other end of the
street is, you can't use an addr:interpolation way, so it seems to me
that you
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Depends on the country.
I'm gonna have to disagree... if it allows both pedestrians and
bicycles, that would be a cycleway in most cases.
Disagree all you like.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
The current scheme with
drawing a way to interpolate is too much work and cumbersome, for me
anyways.
I agree it's cumbersome. The interval is not definite - only that it be at
least 2 because of the spec of
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
wrote:
Depends on the country.
I'm gonna have to disagree... if it allows both pedestrians and
bicycles, that would be a
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Motorway is not a term defined in the MUTCD
It is, however, a term defined in the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic,
which says:
On motorways and, if so provided in domestic legislation, on special
approach roads to and exit roads
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Then doesn't that make it a cycleway? If you're legally allowed to take
a bike down there then, in the eyes of OSM, it's a cycleway
Err no. highway=cycleway indicates that the used way is mainly or
exclusively for bicycles;
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
you
Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
you can do short of mapping each address individually.
Except for this pesky line in the wiki
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
you can do short of mapping each
