> I come to a road with width=3 - that is indeed "useful".
> I come to a road with narrow=yes - that is not as "useful".
I just don't understand how everyone can have the same argument, again
and again, about every new tag or idea suggested.
"highway=residential" - somewhat useful
"highway=reside
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> 1) Use source: to refer to geolocation, where is some string
> that is never going to be used as a key on its own, or
> 2) Redefine source=* to refer to the geolocation of the feature only
> (as opposed to all tags of the feature)
>
> I don't
I've updated the opening_hours page to reflect the discussion from this thread:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key%3Aopening_hours&diff=428825&oldid=426434
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.or
On 23 February 2010 10:45, Pieren wrote:
> have a bigger truck than yours and is 5 meters wide. How can I find a way if
> none of the highways have a width tag ?
So if a way is missing a maxspeed=* tag, that means we can travel at
any speed we like, or should we use the information on street sign
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Pieren wrote:
>>
>> Let's say I'm in a truck that's 4m wide.
>>
>> I come to a road with width=3 - that is indeed "useful".
>> I come to a road with narrow=yes - that is not as "useful".
>
> So if you see a road tagged est_width=4.5, you will take it with your 4m
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> Let's say I'm in a truck that's 4m wide.
>
> I come to a road with width=3 - that is indeed "useful".
> I come to a road with narrow=yes - that is not as "useful".
>
>
So if you see a road tagged est_width=4.5, you will take it with your 4m
w
Requesting comments for Proposal "Tree rows":
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tree_rows
natural=tree_row, used on a way, describes a line of trees.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/l
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Pieren wrote:
>
> But that's the point. If you write on a segment of residential "width=4",
> it will be narrow in US and normal in old Europe. That's why I said that a
> width is only useful if you can compare it to something else.
Let's say I'm in a truck that'
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Cartinus wrote:
>
> On Monday 22 February 2010 06:46:15 Roy Wallace wrote:
> > Please repeat it - I can't see what you're referring to
>
> You could see it well enough to cut it off:
>
> > >Then put decent descriptive comments/tags on your
> > > changesets.
Th
Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
no, you can always compare it to the width of your vehicle, therefore
it doesn't require that all streets are tagged width it.
?? With my Fiat 500 or you BMW X5 ?
AND:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> no, you can always compare it to the width of your vehicle, therefore
> it doesn't require that all streets are tagged width it.
?? With my Fiat 500 or you BMW X5 ?
> AND: you can
> always compare to the construction standards fo
In the USA, we also don"t have the width of the road on signs, only warning
signs at particularly-narrow points. Construction areas on major highways
sometimes have the width posted if the road will be unusually narrow.
Overpasses usually have the vertical clearance labeled, however.
--
Joh
> Australia doesn't have nice the width in metres on a sign for narrow
bits. We get a "road narrows" sign only.
Not to be confused with narrow=yes, even if the tag is related.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetm
On 22 February 2010 19:22, Liz wrote:
> well they could add in the notes that they are 170cm tall and walking on
> crutches if they like
Anyone know what a cheap laser range finder go for these days?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
h
On Monday 22 February 2010 06:46:15 Roy Wallace wrote:
> Please repeat it - I can't see what you're referring to
You could see it well enough to cut it off:
> >Then put decent descriptive comments/tags on your
> > changesets.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
___
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, John Smith wrote:
> On 22 February 2010 18:54, Liz wrote:
> > I reckon "3 paces" would be more helpful than "narrow"
>
> Paces of a short or tall person? :)
>
well they could add in the notes that they are 170cm tall and walking on
crutches if they like
___
On 22 February 2010 18:54, Liz wrote:
> I reckon "3 paces" would be more helpful than "narrow"
Paces of a short or tall person? :)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> If a user is bad at estimating widths I suggest that he measures the
> exact width. Still "narrow" is not a good solution to the problem as
> many posters have already written above.
>
I reckon "3 paces" would be more helpful than "narrow"
Austral
18 matches
Mail list logo
