Roy Wallace napsal(a):
> 2010/5/10 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]"
>>
>> Until there is a better solution I'll use the
>> proposed scheme of landuse='residential' + residential='garden'.
>
> FWIW, I don't like that. Look at "residential=garden"...someone lives
> in the garden?
Well, yes :) You don't
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM, John Smith wrote:
> Please don't confuse land use, what the land is used for, and land
> cover, what is the upper most covering on the "ground"...
Good point. landuse=forest (or tree_farm if locally defined?) is true
even for the week (or whatever) between when th
2010/5/10 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]"
>
> Until there is a better solution I'll use the
> proposed scheme of landuse='residential' + residential='garden'.
FWIW, I don't like that. Look at "residential=garden"...someone lives
in the garden?
___
Tagging ma
Hello all.
I proposed the tag trolley=yes 2 weeks ago, I think all have been discussed so
it's time to vote ^^
The wiki page is always here :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Trolley
Thank you in advance for your votes.
Adrien Pavie
___
On 05/06/2010 07:30 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> I've never heard anyone in Australia refer to Kmart or Target as a
> "discount" store. I have heard this word used for, say, "Crazy Clarks"
> or "Dollars and Sense". But I would have trouble objectively defining
> what it is, exactly, that makes "Crazy C
On 10 May 2010 02:31, Bill Ricker wrote:
> no the suggestion is that instead of historic=ruins one should say
> historic=fort, ruins=yes
>
> at Historic under ruins it says
> A replacement proposal can be found at Proposed_features/ruins
> for ruins of historic buildings. E.g. historic=cas
I really really don't think it is a good idea to degrade the
leisure='garden' tag to mark everything from a castle garden,
dendrological garden (with or without public access), or e.g. small
Japanese garden belonging to a tea-house, to the extreme case of plain
cut grass in some backyard. Such a va
