On 14 May 2010 13:12, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Do we agree there is a basic goal of getting everyone to tag the same
> way? Perhaps the "propose-comment-vote-implemented" lifecycle is not
> right, but "just start using these values" is too weak. How would you
> know if anyone else was using some sim
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:58 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>> right, but "just start using these values" is too weak. How would you
>> know if anyone else was using some similar scheme but with different
>> tags?
>
>
> tagwatch? OSMdoc?
Anyone regularly do this? I'm curious. I don't.
> Still I
2010/5/14 Steve Bennett :
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:05 AM, John Smith
> wrote:
>> The whole proposal seems pretty inconsequential, it's not like you are
>> trying to make a well sued highway tagging scheme redundant.
> Do we agree there is a basic goal of getting everyone to tag the same
> way
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:05 AM, John Smith wrote:
> The whole proposal seems pretty inconsequential, it's not like you are
> trying to make a well sued highway tagging scheme redundant.
Do we agree there is a basic goal of getting everyone to tag the same
way? Perhaps the "propose-comment-vote-
I've contributed a new barrier type (post_and_chain) to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
I have a photo that I've taken of one of these, but I haven't been
able to figure out how to get it into the wiki. None of the other
barrier photos I've seen in the
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:20 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
> leisure=garden
> garden=residential
Much better. This clearly means you are tagging a particular *type* of garden.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/
Hi all,
We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for
the last couple of months, and I hope that we've covered all the
ground that needs to be covered by now. Could those that care to vote,
cast your votes on the page? If you disapprove, please say why and
maybe we can cont
2010/5/13 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" :
> By themselves not, but they are within the residential land and this
> tagging proposal follows the scheme like highway=service + service=whatever.
> I admit, it's not the best solution, but it is already a proposed
> scheme. I don't have a better solution...
By themselves not, but they are within the residential land and this
tagging proposal follows the scheme like highway=service + service=whatever.
I admit, it's not the best solution, but it is already a proposed
scheme. I don't have a better solution... maybe it would be better to
add a new leisure
