I've personally heard "Contraflow" mentioned for the switchover's some DOT's
have on Interstates for Hurricane (or other) evacuations in the press. I know
I-95 in Georgia happens to have two such crossovers, but they don't
specifically say "contraflow" on the signs. Here are links to how they
On 2/18/2011 8:40 PM, James Mast wrote:
NE2, contraflow is for stuff like when an entire highway is reveresed in
an emergancy (like an evacuation)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraflow_lane_reversal
I did use the correct one here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterflow_lane
"A reversible l
NE2, contraflow is for stuff like when an entire highway is reveresed in an
emergancy (like an evacuation)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraflow_lane_reversal
I did use the correct one here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterflow_lane
> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:23:55 -0500
> From: nerou
2011/2/18 Peter Wendorff :
>> In my opinion, the better choice would be to invent a new tag for
>> building parts, and map the entire building's outline as building=yes in
>> addition to the individual parts.
+0.8
I would also like to see building parts, but I think that another
option instead of
2011/2/18 Peter Wendorff :
Hi Peter,
thank you for this explanatory words.
> Is not working and "is using wrong semantics" is not the same.
It is IMHO not consistent with current tagging (that's why I said it
is not working), because building:levels was there long before
min_level. Building le
On 18/02/2011 15:23, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I believe the word is contraflow.
"Contraflow" is certainly the version always used in the UK (generally
preceded by an expletive, as in "stuck in a *** contraflow for two
hours").
A quick web search found both "counterflow" and "contraflow"; m
On 2/18/2011 5:00 AM, James Mast wrote:
Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the
following:
lanes=3
lanes:counterflow=center
I believe the word is contraflow.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lis
Hi.
Am 18.02.2011 13:21, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
On 18.02.2011 12:04, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Am 18.02.2011 11:16, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
building_levels should be the amount of building
levels. If a building forms a "bridge" like in the illustration, where
adjacent buildings have 7 levels
On 18.02.2011 12:04, Peter Wendorff wrote:
> Am 18.02.2011 11:16, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
>> building_levels should be the amount of building
>> levels. If a building forms a "bridge" like in the illustration, where
>> adjacent buildings have 7 levels, the "bridge" has only 2 levels and
>> t
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:16 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/2/18 David Murn :
> > Because the use of (min_)levels,height is in use by 3D renderers and
>
>
> IMHO this min_level-part of the advanced building proposal is not
> working (is using wrong semantics), at least for the illustrati
Hi.
As Initiator and author of the proposal you refer to, let me explain, WHY:
Am 18.02.2011 11:16, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2011/2/18 David Murn:
Because the use of (min_)levels,height is in use by 3D renderers and
IMHO this min_level-part of the advanced building proposal is not
working (
2011/2/18 David Murn :
> Because the use of (min_)levels,height is in use by 3D renderers and
IMHO this min_level-part of the advanced building proposal is not
working (is using wrong semantics), at least for the illustration you
can find in the wiki. building_levels should be the amount of build
James Mast schreef op vr 18-02-2011 om 05:00 [-0500]:
> Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the
> following:
> lanes=3
> lanes:counterflow=center
Don't you want to descripe the center lane? So
lane(s):center=counterflow makes more sense to me.
Michiel
Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the
following:
lanes=3
lanes:counterflow=center
That should work "for now".
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24873632
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
h
14 matches
Mail list logo
