At 2010-08-26 05:08, Tom Chance wrote:
On 26 August 2010 13:43, André
Riedel
riedel.an...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
The source of energy used (generator:source)
Combined with 'generator:method=fission' you have to add
'uranium_235'.
If change the whole system, please add 'wood', 'wood_pellet',
On 21 February 2011 11:08, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2010-08-26 05:08, Tom Chance wrote:
On 26 August 2010 13:43, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote: ...
The source of energy used (generator:source) Combined with
'generator:method=fission' you have to add
On 02/20/2011 08:57 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/20/11 8:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 02/19/2011 08:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Don't we want to break existing consumers if they might route people the
wrong way down a one-way highway?
This whole question suggests that we're somehow
On 2/21/11 9:10 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 02/20/2011 08:57 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/20/11 8:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 02/19/2011 08:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Don't we want to break existing consumers if they might route people the
wrong way down a one-way highway?
This whole
2011/2/21 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
On 2/21/11 9:10 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 02/20/2011 08:57 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/20/11 8:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 02/19/2011 08:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Don't we want to break existing consumers if they might route people
On 21/02/2011 02:51, Paul Johnson wrote:
This whole question suggests that we're somehow responsible for data
consumers paying more attention to their navigation than what's out
their windshield, which is an entirely specious argument for obvious
reasons.
OSM officially only does the data, not
At 2011-02-21 05:30, Tom Chance wrote:
On 21 February 2011 11:08, Alan
Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
wrote:
At 2010-08-26 05:08, Tom Chance
wrote:
On 26 August 2010 13:43, André Riedel
riedel.an...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
The source of energy used (generator:source)
Combined with
