Re: [Tagging] Retaking the discussion on ATMs

CCing spanish list > My experience in the USA is that ATMs are usually part of multiple > different networks; if the ATM is part of at least one of your bank's > networks, but not operated by your bank, you can use it, but pay a > surcharge. In Spain is similar, but there is a distinguished netwo

Re: [Tagging] Retaking the discussion on ATMs

My experience in the USA is that ATMs are usually part of multiple different networks; if the ATM is part of at least one of your bank's networks, but not operated by your bank, you can use it, but pay a surcharge. ---Original Email--- Subject :Re: [Tagging] Retaking the discussion on AT

Re: [Tagging] Retaking the discussion on ATMs

On 04/02/2011 02:42 PM, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: >> On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 20:12 +1100, David Murn wrote: >>> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:33 +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: We've agreed in the spanish list to add the network tag to the ATM, so if there is no discussion against here,

Re: [Tagging] landuse: illegal and illegal:yes/no

On 04/04/2011 15:10, Peter Gervai wrote: What if I'd replace the word "illegal" with "unauthorised" or "unofficial"? (Still, the point is to provide useful data. I took some time to check around the OSM policies and FAQ and stuff and it says that OSM is a database about geographical facts [I do

Re: [Tagging] landuse: illegal and illegal:yes/no

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Peter Gervai wrote: > > What if I'd replace the word "illegal" with "unauthorised" or "unofficial"? > > "unofficial" is ambiguous (something can be "unofficial"/informal but "legal"). Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagg

Re: [Tagging] landuse: illegal and illegal:yes/no

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 13:50, Dave F. wrote: > what part of "illegal" is subjective? IMHO it is quite objective: anything > against the law is "illegal". > > There are many disagreements where land area or borders are contested with > each side claiming it illegal. They can't both be right. > > M

Re: [Tagging] New proposal: water=*

Dave. F wrote: >> But also in this proposal I point out that waterway=riverbank does not >> differ much from natural=water, and suggest to map it with natural=water + >> water=river. >This means you have multiple keys for river (water & waterway). >It also means your using river to describe two d

Re: [Tagging] power line with different wired cables

On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 10:57 +0200, fly wrote: > Hi > > I have found a power line with 3 quad-wired cables on one side and 3 > doubled-wired cables on the other. > > Should I use left/right for this ? Since this is actually 2 lines simply following the same path, I suggest using cables=6 wires=do

Re: [Tagging] New proposal: water=*

On 01/04/2011 16:04, Ilya Zverev wrote: It seems like I've messed up wording or just stated the purpose not clearly enough, since you are not the first to ask this question. Of course I'm aware of river mapping scheme. I do not propose to alter waterway=river/stream/anything. The main point of t

Re: [Tagging] landuse: illegal and illegal:yes/no

On 03/04/2011 09:55, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/4/2 Dave F. mailto:dave...@madasafish.com>> Tracktype is verifiable against a visual scale: http://wiki.openstreetmcan't givap.org/wiki/Tracktype but as it depends much on the clima

Re: [Tagging] Proposed Feature - Public Transport - Voting

I guess I can answer some of the questions. > 1. In the provided links I can see all the street names in German. Do > you have any examples of uses outside of the German cultural raum? We in Russia have created several routes using this schema. For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/r

[Tagging] power line with different wired cables

Hi I have found a power line with 3 quad-wired cables on one side and 3 doubled-wired cables on the other. Should I use left/right for this ? Thanks fly ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging