On 7/19/2011 9:54 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 07/19/2011 02:53 PM, Jason Cunningham wrote:
Wasn't sure what a "splash pad" was and it looks like it's a North
American term for the British "water play area"?
We used to call them "wading pools," but then we ended up with a
generation of idiot par
Thanks for the feedback.
There is no wikipedia entry for "water play area". I'm not sure what language
convention you are referring to. Can you please explain why the British term
should have precedence?
Doing a quick google search, it appears the term "splashpad" is used in the U.K.
Matt
On
I've modified the proposal. Thanks for the feedback.
On Jul 19, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 7/19/2011 7:30 AM, Matt wrote:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/splash_pad
>
> Looks good, except for the statement that they should only be on nodes.
> Here's t
On 07/19/2011 02:53 PM, Jason Cunningham wrote:
> Wasn't sure what a "splash pad" was and it looks like it's a North
> American term for the British "water play area"?
We used to call them "wading pools," but then we ended up with a
generation of idiot parents who think swimming pools and children
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Zsolt Bertalan wrote:
> checkpoint=hiking or cycling or whatever else
I kind of like this, as it has scope to be used for other purposes.
> and instead of hiking_course=value course=value?
Still don't like "course". The term "course" is mostly associated with
co
Wasn't sure what a "splash pad" was and it looks like it's a North American
term for the British "water play area"?
In keeping with the language convention we should be using the British
"playground=water_play_area".
It's definitely a good thing to add, but I'd usually map it as an area
rather th
On 7/19/2011 7:30 AM, Matt wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/splash_pad
Looks good, except for the statement that they should only be on nodes.
Here's the one that I've mapped:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/74893584
___
I'm glad you brought this up. I recently mapped a newly opened accessible
playground that includes these sorts of water features, though it includes
more features than the splash pad shown in the example picture, such as
fixed water guns, and this interactive water canal:
http://www.flickr.com/phot
Le 19/07/2011 13:30, Matt a écrit :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/splash_pad
Please comment.
Thanks,
Matt
This proposal seems good in my opinion. Just why don't you recommend to
tag it as area ? We sometime see some smaller buildings tagged as area,
if a precise source
Hello!
Please, look at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/mark_vehicles,_for_which_restriction_is_operating
.
I've prepared questions for voting - please, check them and, if you
have some ideas, please, leave comments.
User Dinamik
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/splash_pad
Please comment.
Thanks,
Matt___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:33 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 11 July 2011 21:24, Franc Carter wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:19 PM, John Smith
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Has anyone been tagging these from Nearmap imagery or even on the ground?
>>
>> I'd like to knwo how to recognise/nterpret them - seems
Oh, Gawd!
I think you are right. So my newest proposal :) would be:
checkpoint=hiking or cycling or whatever else
and instead of hiking_course=value course=value?
Zsolt
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:52 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/7/15 Zsolt Bertalan :
> > No, I
2011/7/15 Zsolt Bertalan :
> No, I see it as a tourism feature. I don't want to introduce a new
> namespace. The other tag (hiking_checkpoint=yes) is only needed in the rare
> case if we already have a tourism tag.
I agree to the others: don't propose 2 tags for the same thing. As you
say, stampi
14 matches
Mail list logo
