You mean they're not???
On 8/15/11 10:52 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
How does Flickr know to call it an 'AT-AT'? :)
== Mikel Maron ==
+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
From: straup
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 12:4
How does Flickr know to call it an 'AT-AT'? :)
== Mikel Maron ==
+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
>
>From: straup
>To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 12:40 PM
>Subject: Re: [Tagging] man_made=crane
>
>They are also
They are also Easter eggs on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmigurski/4163171983/
On 8/15/11 7:12 AM, Mihkel Rämmel wrote:
Wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Crane about crane has
controversial information on it. On one place it says that these tags can be
used on nodes and ways
Wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Crane about crane has
controversial information on it. On one place it says that these tags can be
used on nodes and ways on other place it says that on nodes and areas.
Shouldn't it be the third option (nodes, ways and areas)?
Mihkel
___
