[Tagging] Tag:bicycle accident=true

2011-08-17 Thread Pieren
Someone added last night a unique contribution in the wiki about a new tag: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_accident%3Dtrue If we believe taginfo stats, this key has not been used until now. The wiki page is also orphan. Is it a good idea to keep such tag in the wiki ? Should we

Re: [Tagging] Tag:bicycle accident=true

2011-08-17 Thread Sander Deryckere
It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at least how I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process. So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process. Op 17 aug. 2011 11:39 schreef Pieren pier...@gmail.com het volgende: Someone added last night

Re: [Tagging] Tag:bicycle accident=true

2011-08-17 Thread Colin Smale
On 17/08/2011 12:19, Sander Deryckere wrote: It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at least how I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process. So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process. Since when is the voting process

Re: [Tagging] Oneway except for buses

2011-08-17 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
In cycle planning in the USA the bikes only direction on a road is called a contraflow lane. My goal in mapping includes that the routers work (both the car and bike routers). Thus I have sometimes mapped the contraflow as a separate short little parallel bike path. It keeps the routers

Re: [Tagging] Oneway except for buses

2011-08-17 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 8/17/2011 3:11 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: In cycle planning in the USA the bikes only direction on a road is called a contraflow lane. My goal in mapping includes that the routers work (both the car and bike routers). Thus I have sometimes mapped the contraflow as a separate short little