On 4/10/2012 4:38 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Martijn van Exel wrote:
A sidewalk is not a lane and it should not be tagged as such. Doing so
would be utterly confusing. Does the lanes proposal (which I think is
horribly overwrought to begin with) not exclude sidewalks?
Not explicitly. And while it
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 4/10/2012 6:38 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>> Not explicitly. And while it is true that the examples don't include
>> sidewalks, they do include cycleways, where we have basically the same
>> debate whether or not they should be separate ways.
>
> Are you talking about bik
On 4/10/2012 6:38 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Not explicitly. And while it is true that the examples don't include
sidewalks, they do include cycleways, where we have basically the same
debate whether or not they should be separate ways.
Are you talking about bike lanes or sidepaths? The latter is
Martijn van Exel wrote:
> A sidewalk is not a lane and it should not be tagged as such. Doing so
> would be utterly confusing. Does the lanes proposal (which I think is
> horribly overwrought to begin with) not exclude sidewalks?
Not explicitly. And while it is true that the examples don't include
On 4/10/2012 2:15 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Martijn van Exel wrote:
Consider this situation: a road on an
incline, the sidewalk follows the road but has steps in some places. You
would want to capture the steps for accessibility reasons, and you can't
by just adding a sidewalk tag to the main way
Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Consider this situation: a road on an
> incline, the sidewalk follows the road but has steps in some places. You
> would want to capture the steps for accessibility reasons, and you can't
> by just adding a sidewalk tag to the main way feature.
Except if you use one of th
> Well. We have a similar situation with "highway=cycleway" or
> "cycleway=track". Not everybody is ready to trace multiple parallel
> ways just for micromapping.
If someone isn't ready - fine, just wait for active mapper to come.
In Minsk, we've come to agreement that highway=* are just routing
On 4/10/2012 12:42 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Nobody said you have to draw sidewalks.
I'm going a little off-topic here, but I just wanted to throw in my
argument for mapping sidewalks separately, because I know there are a
lot of opponents to this practice. Consider this situation: a road o
I recently found myself inconvenienced by turning up for lunch at a
pub that only took cash, when I had only card money on me (something
that I gather a growing number of people make a habit of doing), and
immediately thought that would be a good thing to be able to warn
about on OSM. So now I've
On 4/10/2012 2:26 PM, Pieren wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 4/10/2012 12:38 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
The suggested tagging is IMHO "tagging for the renderer". For tagging
sidewalks it would be sufficent to tag them with footway=sidewalk
without the hi
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 4/10/2012 12:38 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> The suggested tagging is IMHO "tagging for the renderer". For tagging
>> sidewalks it would be sufficent to tag them with footway=sidewalk
>> without the highway-tag. In analogy to th
Hi Martin.
You are right in that highway=footway is obsolete from a pure data point
of view, IF the application supports it.
On the other hand, it might be very likely, that the corresponding
street then gets a foot=no, as that's often the case, if you look at the
street without the footway.
On 4/10/2012 12:38 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
The suggested tagging is IMHO "tagging for the renderer". For tagging
sidewalks it would be sufficent to tag them with footway=sidewalk
without the highway-tag. In analogy to this tagging we would
optionally be mapping an ordinary street as dual c
2012/4/10 Martin Koppenhoefer
> I am coming back to a topic we had some time ago: sidewalks.
>
> According to this page
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk
>
> sidewalks should be tagged with
> highway=footway
> footway=sidewalk
>
> While I agree that for complex situation
I am coming back to a topic we had some time ago: sidewalks.
According to this page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk
sidewalks should be tagged with
highway=footway
footway=sidewalk
While I agree that for complex situations it is helpful to have
dedicated geometry in OSM
Le lun. 09 avril 2012 à 22:23 +0200, Ole Nielsen a ecrit :
> On 09/04/2012 21:11, Guillaume Allegre wrote:
> >Please add a tag to specify that a specific tower is the point where the line
> >comes from underground to aerial. I previously proposed "raiser=yes", but it
> >didn't
> >seem to match exa
16 matches
Mail list logo
