On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> It implies that the shoulder is an official cycleway, when in reality it may
> be full of debris (or worse: http://flbikelaw.org/2012/03/paved-shoulder/ ).
You think it implies that because it's a cycleway=* tag? I wouldn't
read too much
Hmmm. Apparently Thunderbird's 'reply to list' fails when there are
multiple lists. Sending again:
On 4/17/2012 11:47 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
I quite like "cycleway=shoulder". It describes exactly what's going
on: the cycling infrastructure at this point isn't a marked lane
(cycleway=lane), no
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> One regional mapper uses cycleway=shoulder for this, but I see that as
> sub-optimal, since it's primarily a shoulder, not a cycleway. It would be
> like putting cycleway=sidewalk whenever there's a smooth paved sidewalk.
I quite like "c
I'm wondering what the best way would be to tag a good-quality shoulder
that acts essentially as an undesignated bike lane, in that you can use
it but it is not required. Current Florida DOT policy is to use these on
rural roads, with marked bike lanes only when there is a lane to the
right. Fo
Hello all,
A very interesting proposal, thanks. The TMC Inspector you (Infoware)
provided (http://osm-tmc.infoware.de/tmc/) is most helpful in reviewing
this, too. Here's an additional question beyond those from Eckhart Worner
and others. Some ways span well beyond a single adjacent pair of TMC
