Re: [Tagging] drinkable vs. drinking_water

2012-07-22 Thread David ``Smith''
Not specifically to roads, tertiary is the natural next step after primary and secondary; the next one would be quaternary, I think. In the US, official language pertaining to warnings and hazards tends to stick to older words like non-potable or inflammable. On Jul 22, 2012 9:33 AM, "Philip Barne

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Escalators and Moving Walkways

2012-07-22 Thread fly
On 22/07/12 00:56, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 19.07.2012 23:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> >>> To clarify: This is a "moving walkway" that never moves anymore, but you >>> can still walk on ? >> >> Yes. Probably disused=yes would be better than conveying=disused because >> this way you could stil

Re: [Tagging] drinkable vs. drinking_water

2012-07-22 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 11:43 -0400, David ``Smith'' wrote: > Just contributing another data point on vocabulary… > > I am a native English speaker from Ohio, USA. I have been aware of > the term "potable" for many years, probably since asking what it meant > after seeing a water source labeled "no