Hi,
On 08/16/12 06:16, Jais Pedersen wrote:
Looking at his other recent edits, it looks like he is systematically
going through and fixing the issues in OSM Inspectors Multipolygon view:
http://goo.gl/aWpXQ - It still shows the error as i write this, but the
view might have been updated with his
On 16/08/2012 07:58, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 08/16/12 06:16, Jais Pedersen wrote:
Looking at his other recent edits, it looks like he is systematically
going through and fixing the issues in OSM Inspectors Multipolygon view:
http://goo.gl/aWpXQ - It still shows the error as i write this, bu
Dave has been quite rude, and completely dismissive of the value of
anything other than his interpretation of what the wiki states. Internet
etiquette is that you do not respond to rudeness, so I haven't.
Counting parallel lines is a pain, and trying to put the info into
relations is unnecessarily
On 16/08/2012 14:46, Richard Mann wrote:
Dave has been quite rude,
I believe you've confused the meanings of the words rude & critical. I
initially asked a civil, simple question to which you've continuously
evaded giving a direct response. Any curtness on my part is due to your
repeated rel
Am 16.08.2012, 02:53 Uhr, schrieb Dave F. :
The latest editor has split both the closed way & outer polygon, deleted
one of the overlapping ways & added the remaining way to both the outer
way & a newly created multi-polygon (2338583) as a substitute for the
closed way.
Why has the editor
