dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
The waterway segments I collected into the relation are exactly analogous to
roadway segments collected into a route relation. I do not think that the
relation I created constitutes a category, really. --ceyockey
The main reason why route relations are needed
Dear all,
When mapping in Norway lately, I have come across several facilities
that are mainly used for organizing youth camps. Most of them are
owned and operated by Christian organizations, but that other
organizations have some as well. In those places where they have
already been mapped, the m
On 2013-01-05 14:42, Geir Ove Myhr wrote :
Dear all,
When mapping in Norway lately, I have come across several facilities
that are mainly used for organizing youth camps. Most of them are
owned and operated by Christian organizations, but that other
organizations have some as well.
...
Hei,
Wh
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:47 AM, SomeoneElse wrote:
> dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
>>
>> The waterway segments I collected into the relation are exactly analogous
>> to roadway segments collected into a route relation. I do not think that
>> the relation I created constitutes a category, really.
Thanks -- the rationale embodied in the sentence quoted from Toby Murray below
was what drove me to use a relation:
"It allows one real world object to be represented by one object in OSM and
reduces duplication of tags on component ways."
--ceyockey
-Original Message-
>From: Toby Mur
