i've started drafting a proposal for some tags to extend the
fire_hydrant tagging system.
i have a question for the non-US mappers...
in the US, the American Water Works Association has a classification
system dividing
hydrants into 4 groups based on their flow capacity (e.g., class AA is
outp
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013, Richard Welty wrote:
> for the US, water mains are specified in inches. i presume that centimeter is
> the correct
> unit elsewhere. correct?
In Finland, mm is used in all signs. I've not seen other classifications
here besides the diameter. Then we only have only "O" marking
On 09/03/13 19:07, Richard Welty wrote:
i've started drafting a proposal for some tags to extend the
fire_hydrant tagging system.
i have a question for the non-US mappers...
in the US, the American Water Works Association has a classification
system dividing
hydrants into 4 groups based on the
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 14:07 -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
> i've started drafting a proposal for some tags to extend the
> fire_hydrant tagging system.
> i have a question for the non-US mappers...
In the UK, fire hydrants are not the prominent feature they are in the
US and Canada. Here they are m
On 3/9/13 2:30 PM, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 14:07 -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
i've started drafting a proposal for some tags to extend the
fire_hydrant tagging system.
i have a question for the non-US mappers...
The fire brigade will know exactly where they are.
one of the mot
