Re: [Tagging] New childcare proposal

Hello, > im starting a new proposal for detailed tagging of childcare facilities. I > kindly request your comments about this proposal -> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0 Thanks for working on this! This is long overdue, especially considering the Kindergarten p

Re: [Tagging] New childcare proposal

Am Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:16:39 +0200 schrieb def onion : > I kindly request your comments about this proposal -> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0 My first thought: What about orphanages and facilities alike? Regards malenki __

Re: [Tagging] Power generation refinement: power plant model evolution

Hi, 2013/4/14 François Lacombe > It would be great to find out what are the "state of the art" in OSM to > make a better choice than "heads or tails" : *what is used for airports, > train stations, factories,... ?* > Airports : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Daerodrome No relat

Re: [Tagging] riverbanks wiki (was [OSM-dev] Coastline, lakes, rivers)

2013/4/16 Tobias Knerr > So that entire paragraph could in fact be replaced with "An approved > proposal suggests to tag riverbank areas as natural=water + water=river. > Even then, the waterway=riverbank tag should be kept for compatibility." > +1, for the current state. Still, if this tagging

[Tagging] New childcare proposal

Dear osm tagging list, im starting a new proposal for detailed tagging of childcare facilities. I kindly request your comments about this proposal -> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0 best regards defonion ___ Tagging mai

[Tagging] railway=abandoned + highway=cycleway (was: [OSM-talk-be] Abandoned Railways / cycleways)

From OSM-talk-be, with best regards.  I put the questions before the replies ;-) On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:31 PM, André Pirard

Re: [Tagging] riverbanks wiki (was [OSM-dev] Coastline, lakes, rivers)

On 16.04.2013 16:46, Pieren wrote: > You say that "a redefinition of riverbanks has not been approved" but > the current wiki page says the opposite: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank [...] > == New tagging == > A new tagging schema has been approved... > ... The ways

[Tagging] riverbanks wiki (was [OSM-dev] Coastline, lakes, rivers)

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 16.04.2013 11:53, Pieren wrote: > > I'm not sure that the "New tagging" of riverbanks has been really > > adopted, excepted by the 16 who approved it on the wiki > > Just for clarity: A redefinition of riverbanks has *not* been approved >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

The German use of railway=light_rail for S-Bahn is a bit peculiar, since it is generally operated with "heavy" rail equipment (often loco&coaches), to mainline signalling standards (which tend to be defined in terms of the stopping distance for a heavy freight train), and with heavy rail structures

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

btw, here is an example showing how further detail is currently tagged: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/89290807 (FYI, I do not promote all of the used tags, e.g. pzb is an abbreviation of a German term, so it seems to be against tagging guidelines) cheers, Martin___

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

Am 14/apr/2013 um 15:21 schrieb Rovastar : > It seems that the terms light rail and tram are used interchangeably around > the world so mostly ignore my last comments. I don't know where this leave > OSM tagging standards for them though. In the UK we do class them as > different and it just s