With bit coin?
—
Elliott Plack
Sent from Mailbox on iPhone 5
about.me/elliottp
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> Is it reasonable to expect the routing people to extend to lot numbers
>> (e.g. find me lot 252 of Camp
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Is it reasonable to expect the routing people to extend to lot numbers
> (e.g. find me lot 252 of Camp Mingo at 801 Mingo Road)?
>
Ever order a pizza in any but the tiniest apartment complexes, campgrounds
or RV sites? This problem is comm
No, it doesn't. Two reasons for that:
1. the road names in your example are wrong, see:
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/opendata/viewer/ . If the correct
road names are applied, the routing engine will know that one road is
connected through an interchange to another road
2. it's importan
Hi,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/childcare2.0
The proposal seems intuitive but has lots of disambiguations. What if there is
a kindergarten with an after school included? I'd propose amenity=childcare,
childcare:kindergarten=yes, childcare:after_school=yes,
childc
Restrictions on road access in many countries of the world make use of
two different types of weight:
1) Actual weight of vehicle including empty vehicle + driver +
passengers + load [the weight on a weighbridge]
2) Maximum permissible weight for a vehicle, typically used for
registration an
Hi everybody,
after more than a month of waiting for comments on the proposed feature i'd
like to start the voting. Before doing so i kindly request everybody who
wants to get involved to provide their comments on the subject.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0
All
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 19:23 +0200, Johan C wrote:
> For my Garmin both B5065 examples are routed correct by Mapsource. If
> the OSRM heuristics are wrong, than OSRM should get a ticket to make
> its engine better.
That is just one of many examples, does this one work?
http://osrm.at/3Is
http://g
For my Garmin both B5065 examples are routed correct by Mapsource. If the
OSRM heuristics are wrong, than OSRM should get a ticket to make its engine
better.
Cheers, Johan
2013/6/18 Philip Barnes
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 16:45 +0100, News wrote:
> > >
> > > You are correct, we are talking about
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 16:45 +0100, News wrote:
> >
> > You are correct, we are talking about unclassified and tertiary roads.
> > Although this problem also occurs on secondary, primary and trunk roads,
> > a classification is a measure of importance and not always quality. But
> > where did the tu
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 16:50 +0100, Steve Doerr wrote:
> On 18/06/2013 16:45, News wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> You are correct, we are talking about unclassified and tertiary roads.
> >> Although this problem also occurs on secondary, primary and trunk roads,
> >> a classification is a measure of importanc
Am 18.06.2013 18:13, schrieb Bryce Nesbitt:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote:
>
>> What about
>> addr:housenumber=801
>> addr:street=North Mingo Road
>> addr:lot=252
>>
>
> Under current rendering, won't that create lots of little 801's all
> scattered on the map?
Ye
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> What about
> addr:housenumber=801
> addr:street=North Mingo Road
> addr:lot=252
>
Under current rendering, won't that create lots of little 801's all
scattered on the map?
Is it reasonable to expect the routing people to extend to lot
On 18/06/2013 16:45, News wrote:
You are correct, we are talking about unclassified and tertiary roads.
Although this problem also occurs on secondary, primary and trunk roads,
a classification is a measure of importance and not always quality. But
where did the turning lane come from? or even
You are correct, we are talking about unclassified and tertiary roads.
Although this problem also occurs on secondary, primary and trunk roads,
a classification is a measure of importance and not always quality. But
where did the turning lane come from? or even lanes in many cases?
Here is an
Hi,
> You can express this with conditional tagging like
great, thenks!
-nik
--
# apt-assassinate --help
Usage: apt-assassinate [upstream|maintainer]
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
2013/6/18 Dominik George
> I have a question concerning time limits for road access.
>
> When tagging a highway or a barrier with access=no, how can I mark that
> this limitation only exists in a certain time frame? This is the case,
> for example, on a road nearby that is directly in front of a
On 17/giu/2013, at 21:47, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> How do I best map a barrier that is:
>
> * Open to any vehicle with a disability placard
> * Open persons walking or cycling
> * Open to visitors with reservations.
> * Open to park personnel
> * Closed to every other type of vehicle.
motor_vehic
Hi,
I have a question concerning time limits for road access.
When tagging a highway or a barrier with access=no, how can I mark that
this limitation only exists in a certain time frame? This is the case,
for example, on a road nearby that is directly in front of a school and
this road must not b
On 18/giu/2013, at 05:27, Paul Johnson wrote:
> addr:housenumber=801
> addr:street=North Mingo Road
> ...
> lot:number=252
what about
addr:housenumber=801
addr:street=North Mingo Road
addr:lot=252
?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Taggi
19 matches
Mail list logo
