Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (man_made=silo)

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Brad Neuhauser wrote: > My understanding is that tags in general use don't need a vote. Assuming > that's correct, I've updated the man_made=silo page with info from the > proposal. (Although from taginfo, few existing silos have additional tags) > The problem

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (man_made=silo)

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Brad Neuhauser wrote: > My understanding is that tags in general use don't need a vote. I see one use of "silo=*" in taginfo which is not something I would call "general use"... The tags "name=name of the facility" and "operator" shouldn't go on the silos themse

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of topographic areas with a name

Am 17.08.2013, 17:13 Uhr, schrieb fly : On 16.08.2013 19:05, Masi Master wrote: The problem is, that multipolygon don't work in 2 cases: - The areas touch each other. - The "areas" are multipolygons. A multipolygon as a member in a other multipolygon is not allowed. Either we allowed this, or

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of topographic areas with a name

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > At the risk that this is mapping for the renderer, but what > Wolfgang proposes is exactly how it is done on traditional paper maps. It > gives you the possibility to label some loosely defined entity, by creating > some labelling along a n

Re: [Tagging] road side

On 2013-08-19 15:37, Tod Fitch wrote : On Aug 19, 2013, at 6:24 AM, Craig Wallace wrote: Sounds like you mean the "shoulder". See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder It should usually be tagged as an attribute on the highway, not ma

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (man_made=silo)

My understanding is that tags in general use don't need a vote. Assuming that's correct, I've updated the man_made=silo page with info from the proposal. (Although from taginfo, few existing silos have additional tags) Brad On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > Unless there

Re: [Tagging] Re : road side

On Mon, August 19, 2013 11:11 am, yve...@gmail.com wrote: > Is there a generic term that could include shoulder and verge, 'road-side' > maybe ? In the US it would be shoulder for both: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/publications/flexibility/ch06.cfm Maybe shoulder=* Where * is one of grave

[Tagging] Re : road side

Is there a generic term that could include shoulder and verge, 'road-side' maybe ? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (man_made=silo)

Unless there is a objection, I'd like to bring to quick vote this already discussed proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsilo http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Silo This tag has 20,000+ uses, and appears well established. Giving is a proper wiki page makes

Re: [Tagging] road side

Tod Fitch wrote: Except that I think in the UK they might call it the verge so we might have a dialect issue. In the UK "verge" normally means a patch of grass at the side of a road, but if it's a paved area at the side of the motorway that's usually called the "hard shoulder". Cheers, A

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of topographic areas with a name

>Il giorno 18/ago/2013, alle ore 17:54, "Christian Müller" ha >scritto: >> The term boundary does not make any implication on it's width. > it has no width at all, it is a line -1. It may be _represented_ by a line, as declared by an entity. Even though the boundaries of territories may be de

Re: [Tagging] road side

On 2013-08-19 14:37, Tod Fitch wrote: On Aug 19, 2013, at 6:24 AM, Craig Wallace wrote: Sounds like you mean the "shoulder". See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder It should usually be tagged as an attribute on the highway, not mapped as a separate way or area. Craig +1 Except

Re: [Tagging] road side

for better or worse, shoulder has ~1500 uses, verge has zero. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=shoulder On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Tod Fitch wrote: > On Aug 19, 2013, at 6:24 AM, Craig Wallace wrote: > > > > > Sounds like you mean the "shoulder". See > http://wiki.openstreetmap.

Re: [Tagging] road side

On Aug 19, 2013, at 6:24 AM, Craig Wallace wrote: > > Sounds like you mean the "shoulder". See > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder > > It should usually be tagged as an attribute on the highway, not mapped as a > separate way or area. > > Craig > +1 Except that I think in the UK

Re: [Tagging] road side

On 2013-08-19 00:24, André Pirard wrote: Hi, There are many wiki articles mentioning the road side and tagging what's on it, e. g.parking. But I couldn't find how to tag a plain road side itself. It is not part of the roadway (chaussée) but it's part of the public highway (voie publique). Often

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (meadow=pasture)

Il giorno 19/ago/2013, alle ore 11:16, Volker Paul ha scritto: > I proposed (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/pasture) > landuse=pasture, but there seems to be more support for > meadow=pasture together with landuse=meadow. > > Should we use meadow=pasture > to

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of topographic areas with a name

Il giorno 18/ago/2013, alle ore 17:54, "Christian Müller" ha scritto: > The term boundary does not make any implication on it's width. it has no width at all, it is a line > A boundary may be defined on a nanometer, meter or kilometer scale. what doesn't say anything about a width, but

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of topographic areas with a name

Il giorno 18/ago/2013, alle ore 17:29, Craig Wallace ha scritto: > This is already done for ridges, with natural=ridge. > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dridge > It is used a bit. Not sure if any renderers show it. ridges are linear > > I think something similar could be

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of topographic areas with a name

Il giorno 18/ago/2013, alle ore 15:54, Yuri D'Elia ha scritto: > Just for clarity, I was really hoping to find an already-established > tagging scheme for these features (named topological areas, valleys), > and bringing up the schemes I found in several other places rather than > trying to ov

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (meadow=pasture)

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Volker Paul wrote: > Should we use meadow=pasture to tell that a landuse=meadow > is not primarily used for mowing (which is the default) but for grazing? I guess most of the contributors add landuse from aerial imagery. And it is hard to distinguish meadow for

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (meadow=pasture)

Hello, I proposed (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/pasture) landuse=pasture, but there seems to be more support for meadow=pasture together with landuse=meadow. Should we use meadow =pasture