Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-13 Thread Tod Fitch
On Sep 13, 2013, at 12:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > Il giorno 13/set/2013, alle ore 04:49, Tod Fitch ha > scritto: > >> I can think of a number of areas in the US west that would count as >> mountains by that definition if approached from one direction but not the >> other. Mogol

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-09-13 Thread bredy
When finish this discussion? Why not vote? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-Substation-Refinement-tp5762146p5777406.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-13 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Friday 13 September 2013, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > If everyone locally calls it a desert... then what? Print out pages > from wikipedia and start arguing :-)? This is exactly what i was talking about earlier: Just because there are areas which undisputedly qualify as deserts does not mean thi

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Il giorno 13/set/2013, alle ore 04:49, Tod Fitch ha scritto: > I can think of a number of areas in the US west that would count as mountains > by that definition if approached from one direction but not the other. > Mogollon Rim for one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mogollon_Rim looks like

Re: [Tagging] Mapping large areas (was natural=????)

2013-09-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Il giorno 13/set/2013, alle ore 05:47, Bryce Nesbitt ha scritto: > If everyone locally calls it a desert... then what? Print out pages from > wikipedia and start arguing :-)? > chances are high that it really will rain very few in this case, although there might be other kinds of deserts