[Tagging] Opening hours of "inherit" (for aed mapping)?

2013-10-14 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
When tagging an AED (automated external defibrillator) there are two very common values for "opening_hours": 27/7 and "the same as the building it is in". This is relevant if you're outside the building, and the nearest aed is inside. While I could map the opening_hours to be the same as the mall

Re: [Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

2013-10-14 Thread John F. Eldredge
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2013/10/14 Richard Mann > > > bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing > > > > > +1, for routing that should be sufficient, but not for mapping ;-) > If they are explicitly forbidden on all ways it would not be bad to > have it > on all ways a

Re: [Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

2013-10-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/10/14 Richard Mann > bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing +1, for routing that should be sufficient, but not for mapping ;-) If they are explicitly forbidden on all ways it would not be bad to have it on all ways as explicit tag (IMHO). cheers, Martin ___

Re: [Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

2013-10-14 Thread fly
Am 14.10.2013 14:40, schrieb Richard Mann: > bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing Only if you do not allow parts to be footpaths where you push you bike. How about bicycle_pushed=* or pushing_bicycle=*. Maybe even 2wheel_vehicle_pushed ? fly

Re: [Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

2013-10-14 Thread Philip Barnes
A short section of pushing a bike along a footpath will often be preferential to only using a route where a bike can be ridden. Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 14/10/2013 13:40 Richard Mann wrote: bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing On Mon, Oct 14, 20

Re: [Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

2013-10-14 Thread Jonathan
Wow, Oxford's parks sound a fun place to be! Not! ;-) On a more serious note, I would have thought tagging this one: http://cycle.st/p17860 would be straight forward because no pedestrian and no bicycle also means no pushing a bicycle. You gotta wonder who can use he gate? :-) But thanks St

Re: [Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

2013-10-14 Thread Richard Mann
bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Stephen Gower < socks-openstreetmap@earth.li> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) > wrote: > > > > and [Neither cycling nor pushing allowed] would be an a

Re: [Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways

2013-10-14 Thread Stephen Gower
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > > and [Neither cycling nor pushing allowed] would be an area/route > explicitly signed as e.g. "no bicycles not even pushed" (Oxford > University Parks used to be like this until a couple of years ago). Just for the