[Tagging] turn:lanes vs. turnlanes:turn

2013-10-17 Thread Ronnie Soak
Hi, I'm in the process of adding more detail to the major junctions in terms of lane counts, turn lanes, width, etc. There seem to be two tagging schemes in parallel: - the turn:lanes[1] scheme which adds lane descriptions as tags to way segments. - the turnlanes:turn[2] scheme which adds lane c

Re: [Tagging] turn:lanes vs. turnlanes:turn

2013-10-17 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:28:09AM +0200, Ronnie Soak wrote: > Hi, > > I'm in the process of adding more detail to the major junctions in terms of > lane counts, turn lanes, width, etc. > > There seem to be two tagging schemes in parallel: > > - the turn:lanes[1] scheme which adds lane descripti

Re: [Tagging] turn:lanes vs. turnlanes:turn

2013-10-17 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi! 2013/10/17 Ronnie Soak > So my questions: > - Are these schemes both still actively used? Are there data consumers who > use these already? > I don't know about turnlanes, but all the :lanes-keys I watch are continuously growing in usage numbers. > - What are the pros and cons of using t

[Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Pieren
Could someone explain the difference between "tourism=guest_house" and "tourism=bed_and_breakfast" ? Both are suggested here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house but only "guest_house" is really documented in the wiki. In taginfo, we find 527 "tourism=bed_and_breakfast" an

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi! 2013/10/17 Pieren > So, I'm looking if we could reuse the two existing tags > or if I should create a sub-tag like "tourism=guest_house" + > "guest_house=bed_and_breakfast" or > "guest_house=whatever_in_an_independent_building" > +1 for the sub-tags. br, Martin

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread sabas88
2013/10/17 Pieren > Could someone explain the difference between "tourism=guest_house" and > "tourism=bed_and_breakfast" ? > Both are suggested here: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house > but only "guest_house" is really documented in the wiki. > > In taginfo, we find 5

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Dan S
2013/10/17 Martin Vonwald : > Hi! > > 2013/10/17 Pieren >> >> So, I'm looking if we could reuse the two existing tags >> or if I should create a sub-tag like "tourism=guest_house" + >> "guest_house=bed_and_breakfast" or >> "guest_house=whatever_in_an_independent_building" > > > +1 for the sub-tags

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Janko Mihelić
I have come across tourism=apartments, there are 125 of them right now. Are those actually badly tagged tourism=guest_house? I think there's no real difference between them and guest houses. I like the sub-tags. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstree

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Craig Wallace
On 2013-10-17 09:52, Pieren wrote: Could someone explain the difference between "tourism=guest_house" and "tourism=bed_and_breakfast" ? Both are suggested here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house but only "guest_house" is really documented in the wiki. In taginfo, we fi

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-17 Thread Dudley Ibbett
>From a tourists perspective it is quite important to know whether it is self >catering accommodation or not. It is also important to know whether it is a >single building unit (i.e. house,cottage,chalet) as opposed to a number of >units in a building (i.e. apartments). I would be inclined to