Together with user Masimaster I've made a proposal for a new tag to improve
bicycle routing. I think (and hope) the wiki is clear enough but I’ll say a
few words about this new tag.
The tag http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle_use_cycleway is
introduced to separate 2 kinds of roads where
2013/11/12 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
Pee Wee
A couple of questions.
How does this improve mapping/routing over using bicycle=no?
For an ordinary bike I do not think that routing will differ from the
situation where we would tag all these type 2 way's with a bicycle-no .
The problem is
On 12 November 2013 19:04, Pee Wee piewi...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understand correctly you're saying that the combination of a
bicycle=no bicycle:use_cycleway=yes could mean the same thing as the
proposed tag.
Exactly.
I think it could but I'm not realy in favour of this. The main
reason
Hi all,
I'm the co-author of this proposal.
There are a difference about bicycle-forbidden and a compulsory cycleway.
At a bicycle forbidden section cycling is not allowed ever.
At a road with a compulsory cycleway, it is allowed to cycle on the road,
if the cycleway is not passable, reachable
Even I am not Pee Wee nor any author of the proposal, but
Am 12.11.2013 19:29, schrieb Dave F.:
How does this improve mapping/routing over using bicycle=no?
How does your proposal distinguish the exceptions to the rule that you
gave as an example below?
consider a muscular trike, which is
