On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Pee Wee wrote:
> The advantage of a proposal and discussion is that it improves documentation.
+1 and that's already good enough no ? Although I did not myself check
this proposal, the feedbacks seem to express a good idea but a lack of
explanation. This is enou
2013/12/15 Pee Wee
>
> 1. There are no absolute rules as to when it is approved/rejected
> (and I can understand that)
>
there are for voting: we require at least 15 votes and a majority of "yes"
votes. Of course a won voting doesn't make your tag "approved" or used by
the community.
>
>
> 1. There are no absolute rules as to when it is approved/rejected
> (and I can understand that)
>
there are for voting: we require at least 15 votes and a majority of "yes"
votes. Of course a won voting doesn't make your tag "approved" or used by
the community.
> 2. For some re
It is usable only for maps generated for area similar to the one pictured,
therefore it should be added at stage of processing data, not to the OSM
database. It suffers from the same problem as "lets place a single node."
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:16:39 -0800 Tobias Knerr