Johan C wrote:
>As often, it depends on the definition :-) : A tunnel is an underground
>passage for a road or similar.
>http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
People use the word tunnel (or their equivalent word) in different countries in
various contexts; many times these do include all
> Am 23/gen/2014 um 20:47 schrieb Johan C :
>
> As often, it depends on the definition :-) : A tunnel is an underground
> passage for a road or similar.
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
This would clearly exclude building passages from being tunnels (like the other
definitions
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Ilpo Järvinen
> wrote:
> Besides that, here in Finland some of the service ways to
> residential
> buildings are designated as "rescue road" ("pelastustie" in
> Finnish) and
> we've marked
On Jan 23, 2014, at 12:35 PM, yvecai wrote:
> I've checked the 8 piste:type=ski_jump mapped and a part one that is obscured
> by cloud, the others are what they are: the piste on the on the ski jump
> facility (I even forgot I mapped some myself from Bing). I was afraid this
> tag would be alre
Why we have aerialway=platter or T-bars? Maybe the same reason we have
building=house, building=residential, building=garage, building=industrial,
etc. when we could just tag them all building=yes. They are different forms of
a drag lift and the difference has significance to many people.
If yo
I've checked the 8 piste:type=ski_jump mapped and a part one that is
obscured by cloud, the others are what they are: the piste on the on the
ski jump facility (I even forgot I mapped some myself from Bing). I was
afraid this tag would be already used by freestyle jumps.
So I propose:
* piste
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Besides that, here in Finland some of the service ways to residential
> buildings are designated as "rescue road" ("pelastustie" in Finnish) and
> we've marked those with emergency=yes. There even used to be a specific
> sign for these roads
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 1/23/14 1:13 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> > What might people using the tag 'emergency=yes' have meant it to mean?
> > And is it a good use?
> >
> > It's the #2 tag in a space that has some gems (emergency=aed and
> > emergency=phone for example). But I
Used in conjunction with amenity=hospital emergency=yes also implies that a
hospital has an Emergency Room.
For tag-related questions Taginfo and OSM Wiki are good resources:
* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aemergency%3Dyes
* http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/emergency=yes#combinatio
As often, it depends on the definition :-) : A tunnel is an underground
passage for a road or similar.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
Cherio, Johan
2014/1/23 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
> 2014/1/23 Johan C
>
>> It was a bit confusing to me, but tunnel=building_passage seems to be a
2014/1/23 Johan C
> It was a bit confusing to me, but tunnel=building_passage seems to be a
> better one than covered=yes for the situations when a highway is under a
> building.
maybe covered=building_passage is better from a semantical point of view,
as a building_passage is not a tunnel...
It was a bit confusing to me, but tunnel=building_passage seems to be a
better one than covered=yes for the situations when a highway is under a
building. I think ideally such a building should be split giving the
building a different layer than the highway. Strange enough the wiki
says'' *The
laye
In a ropetow, you take a wire, no in a platter. But it's the same type of
ropeways. But in ropetows, you haven't buttons lifts, so it's different as
others buttons lifts, which are with perchs.
2014/1/22 Janko Mihelić
> and a rope_tow is a kind of drag_lift and j-bar is a kind of drag_lift.
>
>
I know Martin, but many people can't understand as I can read…
2014/1/22 Martin Koppenhoefer
>
> 2014/1/22 remont...@free.fr
>
>> And if drag_lift != platter != tbar,
>
>
>
>
> no, the oppposite:
> a platter is a kind of drag_lift and a t-bar is also a kind of drag lift.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
NO !!! I persist, but t-bar are the same as platters. Call Poma, they will
explain to you if you can't understand! There are platters, but with 2
persons. And I add, so tag 3S, 2S, FUNITELS, and others cable_cars ;)
2014/1/22 Tod Fitch
> As an American, I hadn't heard of a platter lift either.
So we return to the top of the problem, why we have aerialway=platter or
t-bars ???!!!
2014/1/22 yvecai
> Thing is, you can expect the average mapper to map an
> aerialway=drag_lift, but you can't expect every average mapper to
> distinguish between xyz-bar, platter, rope tow by reading the wi
I agree with the idea of ski_jump is not a sport. +1 Tobias
2014/1/23 Richard Z.
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:33:41PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> > 2014/1/23 Richard Z.
> >
> > > * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to
> describe
> > > the
> > > details of a technic
Is there more type of ski_jumps, because you purpose ski_jump!
2014/1/23 Janko Mihelić
> 2014/1/23 Richard Z.
>
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>>
> > leisure=ski_jumping_hill (over the whole area)
>> > ski_jump=take_off (or maybe better, ski_jump=in-run)
>> >
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
> Kicking Bird: *How many?*
> John Dunbar: *Like the stars.*
>
Let's be really clear here. * The value to spammers is the URL link.* The
spammers with no relevant physical location
won't be interested except for the URL. Thus, I think th
Note: the experience with keepRight's URL checker shows the potential for
the URL tag as a quality control check.
Local business go out of business all the time: the loss of the URL can
alert the mapper to check for a change on the ground.
___
Tagging mai
On 1/23/14 1:13 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> What might people using the tag 'emergency=yes' have meant it to mean?
> And is it a good use?
>
> It's the #2 tag in a space that has some gems (emergency=aed and
> emergency=phone for example). But I'm mystified by the usage. 20,000
> emergency=yes hig
What might people using the tag 'emergency=yes' have meant it to mean?
And is it a good use?
It's the #2 tag in a space that has some gems (emergency=aed and
emergency=phone for example). But I'm mystified by the usage. 20,000
emergency=yes highways?
_
2014/1/23 Richard Z.
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>
> leisure=ski_jumping_hill (over the whole area)
> > ski_jump=take_off (or maybe better, ski_jump=in-run)
> > ski_jump=landing
> > ski_jump=construction_point
> > ski_jump=judges_tower
>
> I like this proposal
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> We should try to unify tagging of various sport objects as much as
> possible. Golf courses are tagged like this:
> leisure=ski_jumping_hill (over the whole area)
> ski_jump=take_off (or maybe better, ski_jump=in-run)
> ski_jump=lan
hat
>> most
>> sports that can profit from detailed mapping don't use it. We don?t mark
>> hiking
>> trails with sport=hiking, via ferrata's with sport=, waterways with
>> sport=kayaking.
>>
>
> In all those cases sport=* is used to describe what
2014/1/23 Tobias Knerr
> If he wants to tag these things as leisure=ski_jumping_take_off and
> omit the sport key entirely, that's fine with me.
>
I mostly agree with Tobias here, leisure seems a better key for the
facility, but maybe the value should be different. "take_off" sounds like a
spot
2014/1/23 Frederik Ramm
> Perhaps it could work to draw the boundary in the same way as the
> company draws it themselves. If they have, on their web site,
> instructions on how to find them - possibly a map, or a description -
> then they can be placed on the map. If they don't, or try to hide t
On 23.01.2014 12:53, Richard Z. wrote:
> -1
>
> * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to describe the
> details of a technical structure, not to say what kind of sport facility it
> is.
> Would you map ski-pistest with sport=*? How?
The sport=* tag is non-physical. I
Sounds like a good starting point at least.
regards
Peter
Am 23.01.2014 14:12, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/23/2014 09:26 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
>> At a real, existing office with working people, it's possible that I
>> want to go there to apply for a job, to talk to them about an i
Hi,
On 01/23/2014 09:26 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
> At a real, existing office with working people, it's possible that I
> want to go there to apply for a job, to talk to them about an idea, in
> special cases to buy something in personal, even if they usually don't
> do that by personal contact t
Hi,
On 01/23/2014 12:29 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I completely agree that adding online businesses at fake locations is spam,
> but your relevance criteria seem too tight.
I'd rather have too tight criteria (and leave out an occasional URL that
might be useful) than be too open (and give
Hi,
On 01/23/2014 12:30 AM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> Don't you think a visualization of the spatial distribution of online
> businesses would be interesting to someone? Are there more on the east
> or on the west coast of USA?
Two answers
A - get a list of online businesses with addresses, geocode
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:34:42PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Related, in cases where covered is used without a layer tag should there be
> > a common node in the place the way is crossing the building boundary in the
> > same way there are supposed to be common nodes when stre
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:33:41PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> 2014/1/23 Richard Z.
>
> > * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to describe
> > the
> > details of a technical structure, not to say what kind of sport facility
> > it is.
> > Would you map ski-pistest wi
2014/1/23 Richard Z.
> Hi,
>
> considering a fairly short way that is partially covered in several
> places by one or more buidlings:
>
> (1) should the way be split in sections and covered applied striclty only
> to the covered sections
>
yes, as always you should add tags only to the part
2014/1/23 Richard Z.
> * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to describe
> the
> details of a technical structure, not to say what kind of sport facility
> it is.
> Would you map ski-pistest with sport=*? How?
> * 97 is a high percentage ski jump sites that were mapped.
Hi,
considering a fairly short way that is partially covered in several
places by one or more buidlings:
(1) should the way be split in sections and covered applied striclty only
to the covered sections
(2) or is it good enough to mark a larger section with covered and interpret
it to th
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:04:38PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 22.01.2014 21:52, yvecai wrote:
> > 97 sport=ski_jump_take_off, given the number off such facilities in the
> > world can be considered as a massive use of the tag. Should we really
> > change the key even if leisure, man_made or pi
It would be interesting to someone, but it is not reason to misuse OSM. In the
same way that I will not store results of parliament votes - it is also
interesting to somebody, may be presented on map (where parliament is/was
located) and is completely unfit to be part of OSM database.
On W
Am 22.01.2014 23:42, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/22/2014 06:27 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> IMHO this is a geographic reality. If you had to send a letter
>> (physically) you would need exactly this kind of information. A
>> letterbox is also very physical.
>
> We are not an addre
40 matches
Mail list logo
