On 18.09.14 00:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> from landuse, meadow would imply grass for me
Meadow IMO means there is some usage taken from the grass/hay (Weide,
Futterwiese,...).
I use landuse=grass in urban areas (Grünstreifen am Straßenrand), for grass
areas that are not a garden but there u
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> That is really poor idea. IMHO remembering location and object type should
> be enough to identify it.
>
OK, I'm game: let us say it is a node with an amenity and name tag
attached. Let us also say that the positioning is absolutely
> Il giorno 18/set/2014, alle ore 07:57, Friedrich Volkmann ha
> scritto:
>
> Say, how does landcover=grass differ
> from surface=grass?
I agree that in this case it doesn't make a difference, besides that surface is
typically used as an attribute for highways and not as a feature on its ow
On 18.09.2014 01:01, Dave F. wrote:
> On 17/09/2014 22:44, Daniel Koć wrote:
>> We (in Polish forum) think, that changing landuse=grass into natural=grass
>> would make better tagging scheme, since grass is seldom a "landuse" (like
>> the tree is natural=tree, not the amenity or something else). H
The answers you will receive will fall in the following categories
- it's OK to use the ID you propose.
- OSM is not an storages for external IDs, the external DB should link to
OSM objects
- use wikipedia / wikidata links
and no agreement will be reached :-) But that's OSM.
regards
m
On Thu,
That is really poor idea. IMHO remembering location and object type should
be enough to identify it.
2014-09-18 1:43 GMT+02:00 Alex Rollin :
> Hello,
>
> We are surveying for local points of interest.
>
> We need to store an ID for these objects to keep track of them. I think
> this is called a "
Hello,
We are surveying for local points of interest.
We need to store an ID for these objects to keep track of them. I think
this is called a "personal key"?
Something like indonesiaheritage:ID=231892312
Is that the acceptable format for such a thing?
We will then publish a page on the wiki a
On 17/09/2014 22:44, Daniel Koć wrote:
Hello,
We (in Polish forum) think, that changing landuse=grass into
natural=grass would make better tagging scheme, since grass is seldom
a "landuse" (like the tree is natural=tree, not the amenity or
something else). How do you find this idea?
1. I
Similar (albeit same direction) examples would be I 635 HOV in Dallas or US
75 HOV leading north from I 635.
On Sep 17, 2014 2:30 AM, "Mateusz Konieczny" wrote:
> Mapping contraflow lane as dual carriageway is a really poor idea. It is
> OK only for physically separated lane.
>
> 2014-09-17 1:59
> Il giorno 17/set/2014, alle ore 23:44, Daniel Koć ha scritto:
>
> We (in Polish forum) think, that changing landuse=grass into natural=grass
> would make better tagging scheme, since grass is seldom a "landuse"
from landuse, meadow would imply grass for me
natural is mostly describing a
Hello,
We (in Polish forum) think, that changing landuse=grass into
natural=grass would make better tagging scheme, since grass is seldom a
"landuse" (like the tree is natural=tree, not the amenity or something
else). How do you find this idea?
--
Mambałaga
_
So far, highway=traffic_signal is only defined for nodes and there are
only few ways and fewer relations.
Also in favour of separation I would prefer to use junction=* with
name=* and only highway=traffic_signal with name if it is only a single
light (e.g. the case with a named junction and differ
2014-09-17 10:12 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt :
> Incidentally, this is a similar clock tower in Chile:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1905022230
>
> (it's not rendered on Mapnik)
btw.: shouldn't this be "analogue" rather than the American version
"analog"?
I have opened an issue here:
http:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Lukas Sommer wrote:
> For the junction!
>
> For a named junction with a (not named) traffic signal: junction=yes +
> highway=traffic_signals. (Quite common on Korea – on the ground, not in the
> database.)
Ok, I improved the wiki about this
:http://wiki.openstree
Incidentally, this is a similar clock tower in Chile:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1905022230
(it's not rendered on Mapnik)
On 16 September 2014 23:11, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> Andy Mabbett wrote on 2014-09-16 22:10:
>
>> How should this clock:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber
Mapping contraflow lane as dual carriageway is a really poor idea. It is OK
only for physically separated lane.
2014-09-17 1:59 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt :
> I map contraflow as dual carriageway, to avoid this issue.
> Both sides get oneway=yes, plus a full list of the modes allowed (psv,
> bicycle
16 matches
Mail list logo
