These are all rendering questions that should be discussed separately
from tagging, as there can be many different map styles being created
for different purposes.
johnw wrote on 2014-09-25
Or make Highway=trunk a little brighter green, so it stands out against the
wood even more.
johnw
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Pee Wee piewi...@gmail.com wrote:
No it not a language problem or a dictionary issue. It's about an OSM data
consumer (openfietmap) that thinks it is important to for cyclist to know
what type of paving can be expected. Paved, unpaved and semi-paved to keep
It's not uncommon that actually the brand (e.g. Texaco) is being used on
either operator, or brand, or name. Only the latter is rendered, which can
be logical as in common speaking one easily says: I'll fill my car up at
the next Texaco' rather than saying 'I'll fill my car up at the fuel
station
Am 25.09.2014 11:48, schrieb Pieren:
I think the main issue raised in this thread is to decide if each data
consumer can decide alone what surface is paved or not (using this
surface key and its hundreds values) or if we are able to find a
common definition stored in the osm db (using this paved
