[Tagging] hitch rack for horses

2014-11-07 Thread Mike Thompson
How should one tag a hitch rack? This is a place to tie horses. For example, at a location where a rider may want to dismount and continue on foot because the way ahead is not suitable for horses. I searched the wiki, but didn't find a suitable tag. Mike

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap

2014-11-07 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2014-11-05 20:32 GMT+01:00 Kotya Karapetyan : > >> It looks like the best solution would be to have amenity=water, >> drinkable=*, type=fountain|tap|water_well. > > That does not sound best at all, especially as most maps render based

Re: [Tagging] place=island wiki page - coastline

2014-11-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-11-07 0:02 GMT+01:00 John F. Eldredge : > The Caspian Sea, the Dead Sea, and the Great Salt Lake are all landlocked > bodies of salt water. There are other salt lakes around the world, plus > various brackish bodies of water (of an intermediate degree of saltiness). > The Sea of Galilee is fr

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap

2014-11-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-11-05 20:32 GMT+01:00 Kotya Karapetyan : > It looks like the best solution would be to have amenity=water, > drinkable=*, type=fountain|tap|water_well. not sure if this is "best". Water that is not drinkable is not an amenity in my book ;-) As a sidenote, the key "type" is reserved for re

Re: [Tagging] governmental / public_administrative landuse are not commercial

2014-11-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-11-07 11:02 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer : > Yes I agree we should not include them, for two main reasons: > > - landuse should not describe ownership, by any means. Ownership > is not publicly verifiable, they remain closed source. > for publicly owned land it is often possible to get ownership

Re: [Tagging] governmental / public_administrative landuse are not commercial

2014-11-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-11-07 8:30 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale : > I would not expect the landuse value of the municipal bus company's HQ to > change if the bus company was privatised... Only the ownership will have > changed, nothing else. Actually, as the buildings are probably leased from > a property company anyway, e

Re: [Tagging] governmental / public_administrative landuse are not commercial

2014-11-07 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Yes I agree we should not include them, for two main reasons: - landuse should not describe ownership, by any means. Ownership is not publicly verifiable, they remain closed source. Even when land registries (fr/cadastre de/Kataster) now publish property boundaries, the owner remains closed

Re: [Tagging] governmental / public_administrative landuse are not commercial

2014-11-07 Thread phil
On Fri Nov 07 2014 07:30:30 GMT+ (GMT), Colin Smale wrote: > > > I would not expect the landuse value of the municipal bus company's HQ > to change if the bus company was privatised... Only the ownership will > have changed, nothing else. Actually, as the buildings are probably > leased from