> leisure=playground
> playground:supervised=yes/no
> playground:outdoor=yes/no
> playground:indoor=yes/no
kids_area=* is not about these 4 tags. kids_area=* is disjoint to
leisure=playgrounds. Please read proposal.
http://www.imenno.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/HD_08.jpg-940x626.jpg -
leisure=p
Hi!
By the revert of
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
from19 Dec 2014 18:06,
a lot of essential inormations were swept away.
To cope the criticism of lacking consense,
I have now revised it in a way that nobody can compliain of omitted variants,
see
I am not really sure what this article is trying to say. Like Mateusz, I
object to the line -
... "Important is that every mapper does not only note if the object or
quality he has searched for is there, but also has to note if it is not
there."
There is wide agreement that many objects have def
2014-12-18 17:38 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann :
>
> Whatever. I am sure that there is some correct name of the administrative
> division type. It is up to the german community to find out.
>
yes, legally it's "Einheitsgemeinde", but that's maybe not a title...
The "Land" has the title "Stadtstaat
On 18.12.2014 16:44, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> In Berlin there is no such thing like a "Gemeinde" there are the "Bezirke"
> divided into "Ortsteile", and while the first do correspond roughly to
> Landkreisen (regarding the number of inhabitants) they don't have the power
> (they are indeed not
This advocates adding [oneway=no; toll=no] to nearly all roads (just
because some are with toll and oneway).
I consider this as a bad idea.
2014-12-18 15:28 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm :
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Mappers,_evaluators_and_feedback
>
> This article is an attempt
2014-12-18 16:31 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer :
>
>
> On the other hand, it might maybe also qualify as theme park? What is the
>> distinction?
>>
>
> Lack of a theme, I'd say, besides playing.
well, this one might be "squirrels on LSD"
http://lnx.gommolandiaroma.it/portal/system/files/C1.JPG ;-)
2014-12-18 16:42 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann :
>
> > As far as I can see, Berlin is a Bundesland and a Gemeinde.
> >
> > The term "Bundesland" is of mostly colloquial use, the official term is
> > "Land", so it is "Land Berlin" for the admin level 4 entity. At the same
> > time, it is also "St
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2014-12-17 15:39:
I also know a place that might fall into this category:
indoor streetview:
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8462111,12.4869449,3a,75y,151.95h,69.96t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1sq3Z8vG9t0TkAAAQfCNjLlg!2e0!3e2
some pics: http://lnx.gommolandiaroma.it/portal/g
On 18.12.2014 14:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> the official name AFAIK is "Land Berlin"
Sounds good. So it's admin_title=Land, then.
> As far as I can see, Berlin is a Bundesland and a Gemeinde.
>
> The term "Bundesland" is of mostly colloquial use, the official term is
> "Land", so it is
Andreas Goss wrote on 2014-12-17 22:41:
I don't see a need for a new key here.
The properties can be easily modelled with sub-tagging of playground:
leisure=playground
playground:supervised=yes/no
playground:outdoor=yes/no
playground:indoor=yes/no
I agree in general, but the main issue with ta
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Mappers,_evaluators_and_feedback
This article is an attempt to write down basic rules of/for OSM
that had been forgotten to fix in the very beginning.
I had started that page with an invitation on the discussion page to do the
move now done by Fred
Am 18.12.2014 um 05:04 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org:
> On 11/08/2014 04:47 PM, Pee Wee wrote:
>> We are writing to you for advice on what steps we should or could take
>> next. The situation is best summarized as:
>
> [...]
>
> After some consideration I have today asked user ulamm
for reference, there have been discussions on this previously:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2013-August/014401.html
and this tag amenity=public_bookcase was indeed discussed. I also think it
is a good tag and far better than amenity=reuse.
Cheers,
Martin
_
Really prefer a tag like this over amenity=reuse. Reuse will just be
used for everything in the end and nobody knows what it exactly stand for.
__
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88
___
Tagging mailing lis
On 2014-12-18 14:42, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 17.12.2014 23:23, Colin Smale wrote:
In the UK "designation=" is in wide usage for this. I don't know if it
is typically a UK thing (it wouldn't surprise me) but local
governments sometimes have the right to change their "style" - for
example
On 17.12.2014 23:23, Colin Smale wrote:
> In the UK "designation=" is in wide usage for this. I don't know if it is
> typically a UK thing (it wouldn't surprise me) but local governments
> sometimes have the right to change their "style" - for example a "civil
> parish" can choose autonomously to c
2014-12-18 13:52 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann :
>
> On 17.12.2014 22:08, Andreas Goss wrote:
> > So what do you do with Berlin? State? City? "Stadtstaat" (Citystate)?
>
the official name AFAIK is "Land Berlin"
>
> As far as I can see, Berlin is a Bundesland and a Gemeinde.
The term "Bundesla
2014-12-18 11:01 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald :
>
> Just want to thanks François for his very professional approach in
> introducing new tags and cleaning up existing ones. Thumbs up. That's hard
> work and it's not always fun ;-)
>
Thank you Martin for these kind compliments.
> Tags doesn't have to
2014-12-17 20:11 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann :
>
> On 17.12.2014 16:56, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > isn't this already covered by name and its variants?
> > e.g.
> > name="Bezirk Zwettl"
> > short_name="Zwettl"
> >
> > or
> > name="Zwettl"
> > official_name="Bezirk Zwettl" ?
>
> No, because the
On 17.12.2014 22:08, Andreas Goss wrote:
> So what do you do with Berlin? State? City? "Stadtstaat" (Citystate)?
As far as I can see, Berlin is a Bundesland and a Gemeinde. So you should
have one boundary relation for each level. If you decide to use a boundary
relation for the top level only, adm
Just want to thanks François for his very professional approach in
introducing new tags and cleaning up existing ones. Thumbs up. That's hard
work and it's not always fun ;-)
2014-12-18 10:44 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe :
>
> They both aren't yet approved and must be used with caution.
>
Tags does
Hi all,
I wanted to introduce some updates on power transmission proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement
Two values for power=* had been suggested on talk page :
- power=terminal : To map wall supports for power lines, especially to
connect them
"usually, the purpose of visiting a playground is to, um, visit the
playground."
"The purpose of a play area is (AFIK) a place to deposit the kids while
(one of) the adults do something else"
It is not so simple. Some more interesting play areas also may be target of
visit (for example - nearby I
24 matches
Mail list logo
