Re: [Tagging] religion=multi* ?

2015-01-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
M 2015-01-08 23:21 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com: The exact word is nondenominational, but multi fits with OSM definitions. Maybe referencing that word on the wiki definition is the way to go. Wikipedia: A non-denominational person or organization is not restricted to any particular or

Re: [Tagging] religion=multi* ?

2015-01-08 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-01-09 00:56: denomination=none ;-) Nice, but we need to stay on the religion= level 2015-01-08 23:21 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com: The exact word is nondenominational, but multi fits with OSM definitions. As above, I would avoid the term 'denomination' in

Re: [Tagging] religion=multi* ?

2015-01-08 Thread johnw
SomeoneElse wrote on 2015-01-08 23:28: Would you see an OSM-relevant difference between them, or could they go with the same multi(faith) value? tom Multi seems to be the right value. the definition on the wiki should reference those other fancier words so there is no confusion.

Re: [Tagging] religion=multi* ?

2015-01-08 Thread althio althio
How about... non-denominational places (Airport chapels ...) religion=all places shared between faiths religion=multi Optionally more details with a scheme similar to: religion:christian http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/religion=christian=yes/* religion:muslim

Re: [Tagging] religion=multi* ?

2015-01-08 Thread johnw
On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org wrote: No value has been documented so far for rooms dedicated for worshipping without being limited to a specific religion. My favourite would be multi as is is concise and also used in sport=multi, The exact word is

Re: [Tagging] religion=multi* ?

2015-01-08 Thread SomeoneElse
On 08/01/2015 22:21, johnw wrote: On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org mailto:t.pfei...@computer.org wrote: ... My favourite would be multi as is is concise and also used in sport=multi, The exact word is nondenominational, but multi fits with OSM definitions.

Re: [Tagging] Boundary Relations. What's a subarea used for?

2015-01-08 Thread Steve Doerr
On 08/01/2015 01:21, Dave F. wrote: Are they relevant? If so, what are they for? The wiki suggests they're superseded: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members No it doesn't, it says they're 'optional, disputed, and redundant'. The term 'redundant' has multiple

Re: [Tagging] Boundary Relations. What's a subarea used for?

2015-01-08 Thread Pieren
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: So yes, remove them if you are familiar with the mapping style in the area you're editing and they are indeed unusual there, but leave them in place if it looks like the standard operating procedure in the area. In

[Tagging] religion=multi* ?

2015-01-08 Thread Tom Pfeifer
No value has been documented so far for rooms dedicated for worshipping without being limited to a specific religion. It is useful however so a renderer could apply a specific icon, and a mapper sees that it is not just forgotten. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion Such rooms are

Re: [Tagging] Boundary Relations. What's a subarea used for?

2015-01-08 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 08/01/2015, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/01/2015 01:21, Dave F. wrote: Are they relevant? If so, what are they for? The wiki suggests they're superseded: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members No it doesn't, it says they're 'optional,