Can we assume the houses at the ends of terraces are to be tagged as semi
detached? This needs a bit more thinking through...
On 17 September 2015 16:48:48 CEST, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
>sent from a phone
>
>> Am 17.09.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>>
>> building:type=semidetached_
On 2015-09-17 18:02, Kotya Karapetyan wrote :
> Hi André,
>
> I don't know why your text was removed.
>
> > It would produce a message saying something like:
> > "The coordinates you are trying to change are accurate to 25 cm.
> > You probably shouldn't change this tag, certainly not with GPS
On 2015-09-17 16:29, Ruben Maes wrote :
> Hi all Yesterday iD got a new preset: building=semidetached_house.
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2776
I don't see *at all* why such a tag would be needed as it's perfectly
obvious from the topology that the building is semidetached and as it
Hi André,
I don't know why your text was removed.
> It would produce a message saying something like:
> "The coordinates you are trying to change are accurate to 25 cm.
> You probably shouldn't change this tag, certainly not with GPS data.
> Are you certain that you will not destroy valuable data
sent from a phone
> Am 17.09.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>
> building:type=semidetached_house,
is ok for me. We should write a definition into the wiki, thank you for
preparing a proposal.
> building:type=dwelling_house,
is this a house where someone is living? I prefer the values
Hi all
Yesterday iD got a new preset: building=semidetached_house.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2776
This tag is *not documented anywhere at all*. Additionally it seems to merely
be the result of an import ([1]) (See my comments on the GitHub issue.)
Bryan doesn't see any problem
