Re: [Tagging] new access value

> On Oct 11, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Éric Gillet wrote: > > Hello, > I know this is not a vote or anything close, but wanted to say I don't think > a ban, especially a month-long ban, was warranted by Frederik's two last > messages. I disagree with Frederik's position

[Tagging] Unmarked opening hours

In the course of surveys, I fill in opening_hours of shops and other venues. Sometimes though, they are not marked outside. Therefore, when looking at a feature that lacks opening_hours other mappers and I can't tell the reason. I've been thinking of a standardized way of marking such cases, like:

Re: [Tagging] new access value

> On Oct 11, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Éric Gillet wrote: > > Hello, > I know this is not a vote or anything close, but wanted to say I don't think > a ban, especially a month-long ban, was warranted by Frederik's two last > messages. Oops - forgot to add: +1 Javbw

Re: [Tagging] new access value

It was my impression that the discussed had cooled down before the moderator brought the particular mail back up after 1 of 2 days. Although there was a particular moment that I thought, "guys, please relax, take a deep breath", but I thought that moment was behind us. But still I'm not in favour

Re: [Tagging] new access value

Hello, I know this is not a vote or anything close, but wanted to say I don't think a ban, especially a month-long ban, was warranted by Frederik's two last messages. Maybe the problematic idiom was a bit harsh, but most of the posts contributed to the ongoing discussion. 2015-10-10 10:49

Re: [Tagging] new access value

I have suspended Friedrich Volkmann from this list for one month for incivility. Please be tolerant and considerate in your postings, and avoid insults. If you do not understand a particular idiom, please don't use it. Richard tagging@ list admin

Re: [Tagging] new access value

Hi, On 10/10/2015 12:12 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > can you please explain, where? Is it because he didn't "retract" the > "get a life"? Or because he was complaining that he got rebuked and > Florian wasn't? I think that mailing lists work like football games in that respect. In a football

Re: [Tagging] new access value

dieterdreist wrote: > Is it because he didn't "retract" the "get a life"? Yes. The mailing lists are generally better than the nadir of a couple of years ago and it's incumbent on us all to make sure they don't descend to that state again. It is absolutely not ok to respond to someone who is