Re: [Tagging] nursing homes and group homes

Am 27.06.2016 um 12:17 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: +1 to social_facility=nursing_home Just some days ago I had to change with my father from a retirement home (with ambulant care) to a nursing home with 24/7 care. I looked at the social_facility scheme - stumbled about the disclaimer -

Re: [Tagging] nursing homes and group homes

Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > Recently we have discovered (in a thread on the Italian ML), that someone > has deprecated amenity=nursing_home by putting a disclaimer on the wikipage > [1] to use > > amenity=social_facility > social_facility=group_home > > because the

Re: [Tagging] nursing homes and group homes

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:55 AM, John Willis wrote: > +1 to > social_facility=nursing_home > I agree also with John's statement about the differences between a nursing_home and a group_home. A nursing_home provides full service and care for people who cannot take care of

Re: [Tagging] nursing homes and group homes

> On Jun 27, 2016, at 7:17 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > +1 to > social_facility=nursing_home +1 As I understand it, the care given in a nursing home is much greater. My Mother In Law lives in a nice home after a stroke; she cannot do any basic living

Re: [Tagging] nursing homes and group homes

2016-06-27 11:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Pfeifer : > No. amenity=social_facility is a success story of structured tagging, and > nursing_home -> social_facility shows in Mathias Dahl excellent tag > migration > analysis [1] as the tag with the highest transition count, thus

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - access:electric = * - Access key for vehicles powered by an electric motor

ned, 26. lip 2016. u 21:07 Martin Koppenhoefer napisao je: > It would be interesting to know how this competes with other access keys. > Example: there are tags highway=tertiary, > hgv=no, bicycle=no, access:electrical=yes on a road, would I have access > with an electric

Re: [Tagging] nursing homes and group homes

2016-06-27 11:48 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen : > No, in my opinion, amenity=social_facility+social_facility=group_home > was intended as a structured way of tagging amenity=nursing_home. > wouldn't it make more sense to use social_facility=group_home only for group

Re: [Tagging] nursing homes and group homes

On 6/27/2016 7:56 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2016/06/27 11:20: Recently we have discovered (in a thread on the Italian ML), that someone has deprecated amenity=nursing_home by putting a disclaimer on the wikipage [1] to use amenity=social_facility

Re: [Tagging] nursing homes and group homes

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2016/06/27 11:20: Recently we have discovered (in a thread on the Italian ML), that someone has deprecated amenity=nursing_home by putting a disclaimer on the wikipage [1] to use amenity=social_facility social_facility=group_home [...] What do you say, shouldn't