Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

> On Aug 26, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, yo paseopor > wrote: > If you know which turn:lane it is you can specify it instead there's no > marks. In Spain, with

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, yo paseopor wrote: > If you know which turn:lane it is you can specify it instead there's no > marks. In Spain, with administrations in crisis some of them don't paint > all the lanes (before the crisis they painted all the lanes). So I

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Georg Feddern wrote: > Am 26.08.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Kieron Thwaites: > >> I can, however, see the rationale behind tagging "none;slight_right", >> as well as tagging nothing at all, and as such, I think that this is >> an issue that we

Re: [Tagging] Question on exit-entrance rendering.

Instead of this "messy map"... I don't think it is so difficult. It is hard because of all the amount of information you need to describe correctly but it is "easy". OSM can work with a 3D system, with in layers. Also you have the incline tag,ele, exit_to, ref, ref:colour, destination: ,

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

Am 26.08.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Kieron Thwaites: I can, however, see the rationale behind tagging "none;slight_right", as well as tagging nothing at all, and as such, I think that this is an issue that we need to find consensus on. That said, I believe Paul is quite correct with his statement

[Tagging] Question on exit-entrance rendering.

Shuto Expressway system map, 24mb PDF. http://www.shutoko.jp/%7E/media/pdf/customer/use/network/navimap/160701_map_big.pdf I am wondering about proper motorway entrance-exit tagging when there seems to be one tag that handles the intersection (highway=junction) and all the other information

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

If you know which turn:lane it is you can specify it instead there's no marks. In Spain, with administrations in crisis some of them don't paint all the lanes (before the crisis they painted all the lanes). So I think we can explain the destination...if we know it, and if we want to do it (put

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

It is quite simple, If there is a through arrow, the value is through. If there is no arrow, the value is none. Groundtruth mapping! Cheers, Johan 2016-08-26 15:41 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson : > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 8:19 AM, yo paseopor wrote: > >> I

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 8:19 AM, yo paseopor wrote: > I think you can specify the information you know instead this information > is not explicit written on the road. So for me , in my opinion it is better > specify through or whatever will be the direction that none or

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

I think you can specify the information you know instead this information is not explicit written on the road. So for me , in my opinion it is better specify through or whatever will be the direction that none or |" " (blank) or something like that. yopaseopor

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:51 AM, yo paseopor wrote: > I think it is so clear. Instead of no painting marks with an arrow, you > have some vertical signs and also no_change lane marks, so for me it is > clear how it works. With all traffic signs, posted I think the junction

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

I think it is so clear. Instead of no painting marks with an arrow, you have some vertical signs and also no_change lane marks, so for me it is clear how it works. With all traffic signs, posted I think the junction will have all the information software needs to process it. Also I think it is tru

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

I can't comment whether this is "proper" usage or not, but I can illustrate how I've personally tagged lanes at freeway exits: Take, for example, this freeway interchange close to where I grew up (note: left-hand drive): https://goo.gl/maps/5eF35SVed452 There's no lane markings to indicate

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:06 PM, David Mease wrote: > Road markings are both beneficial and useful for navigation. Cities and > governments have paid a lot of money installing them all over globe > precisely for these reasons. OSM would be well served to include them >

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Rihards wrote: > On 2016.08.26. 00:15, Jack Burke wrote: > >> Freeway exit tagging >> >> >> I am totally confused. >> >> What is the proper method to use turn:lanes to tag freeway lanes >> approaching an exit, where the exit branches directly