2017-02-21 8:16 GMT+01:00 Malcolm Herring :
> On 20/02/2017 20:14, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> agreed, the wiki page titled 'Harbour' gives an overview of both, maybe
>> the page should be renamed
>>
>
> I could rename it "Harbours and Ports" and add text to cover ports, but
> first I need som
PS: I was going to propose "landuse=port" as an obvious choice.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 20/02/2017 20:14, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
agreed, the wiki page titled 'Harbour' gives an overview of both, maybe the
page should be renamed
I could rename it "Harbours and Ports" and add text to cover ports, but
first I need some agreed tagging for ports. That was the question asked
i
sent from a phone
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 18:15, Malcolm Herring
> wrote:
>
> Ports and harbours are not the same thing. A harbour is merely a sheltered
> body of water protected by man made or natural structures. A port, on the
> other hand, is the whole infrastructure for handling ships & th
Ports and harbours are not the same thing. A harbour is merely a
sheltered body of water protected by man made or natural structures. A
port, on the other hand, is the whole infrastructure for handling ships
& their cargoes. This may include any number of harbour areas, but also
wharves, piers,
In the USA, those would commonly be referred to as a brush pile or brush
row. They are commonly seen at the edge of a field that has recently been
cleared of bushes and saplings. Sometimes they are left to decay in place,
sometimes they are burned, and sometimes they are ground up by a
wood-chi
2017-02-20 16:58 GMT+01:00 :
> I can't find any ports in my OSM data. I'm afraid I just forgot to add
> this tag in styles when import.
> Anyway, what is the correct way to get ports?
>
I would have expected them in man_made but apparently they are "hidden" in
seamark subtags, a few hundred lan
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:58 PM, wrote:
> I can't find any ports in my OSM data. I'm afraid I just forgot to add this
> tag in styles when import.
> Anyway, what is the correct way to get ports?
They are "harbours"
You can take a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Harbour
Also, we have
I can't find any ports in my OSM data. I'm afraid I just forgot to add this tag in styles when import.Anyway, what is the correct way to get ports?In openstreetmap.org I can't find them too but I don't know if the port was just not added yet.This is the Rio de Janeiro port. When I query this area
Just re-read the section in the BCTV handbook and the form they describe under
"dead hedging" is rather different from the straightforward brash pile. Both
exist, although in my experience the latter is commoner, but I don't do
conservation work in woodland suffering from too much grazing by dee
I've many such things: the material is called brash (sometimes brush) in the
UK. It is often just collected in piles or in longer rows (typically at the
edge of the area being worked on) and these are usually referred to as brash
piles.
Brash is also used to deliberately fill gaps to discourage
There are problems with this approach.
Many trees are pollarded once in their lifetimes: I'm currently looking out at
some Beech trees which were probably pollarded 70 years ago, and there's a
Birch which was pollarded rather crudely 50 years ago in the neighbours garden.
Ancient pollards can be
Currently nothing breaks when SIT is used and additional ways are added
as a stop gap measure to enable "current" routing engines to work a bit
in such areas (just as it is common to do with pedestrian areas and so
on), and nobody has suggested that such mapping be outlawed (if that was
at all poss
13 matches
Mail list logo
