The thing I am tagging is not a dam. It is a series of flood basins, one of
which is a "reservoir". They are made by levees that surround the rivers, but
in a very complicated way. They eventually return all the water back to the
river, shortly after it is captured.
I explain that below, if y
On 24-Mar-17 03:51 AM, Tobias Wrede wrote:
Hello,
actually, I have used
warterway=spillway
intermittent=yes
in the past, reasoning that this particular spillway
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451309286) is rarely put to use,
while others might be more permanently flooded (regularly du
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> “stop:forward=yes” & “stop:backward=yes” seem like they are putting a
> value in the key as the stuff to the right of the equals may never be
> anything other than “yes”. On the “lanes:forward” and “lanes:backward” keys
> at least the values c
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> >
> > - highway=stop+direction=forward node on the incoming way... Only
> > covers the simple case but covers it simply
>
I prefer the subkey :forward
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:44:17AM +0900, John Willis wrote:
> How do you tag an emergency spillway?
>
> I am tagging a giant flood control reservoir in my region. The “lake” is
> surrounded by giant man-made embankments on all sides, surrounded by an
> additional set of embankments, with gate
sent from a phone
> On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
>
> - highway=stop+direction=forward node on the incoming way... Only
> covers the simple case but covers it simply
while this might work often with stop signs it'll hardly work with maxspeed
signs, because the changing
Hello,
actually, I have used
warterway=spillway
intermittent=yes
in the past, reasoning that this particular spillway
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451309286) is rarely put to use, while
others might be more permanently flooded (regularly during high tides
for example)
Tobias
Am 2
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:31:47 +0100
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2017-03-23 15:47 GMT+01:00 Jean-Marc Liotier :
>
>> I'm not operating a routing system so maybe someone who is
>> might offer his opinion on that point
>
> in another thread a few days ago there was a comment by Daniel
> Hofmann
2017-03-23 15:47 GMT+01:00 Jean-Marc Liotier :
> I'm not operating a routing system so maybe someone who is
> might offer his opinion on that point
>
in another thread a few days ago there was a comment by Daniel Hofmann who
works at mapbox on OSRM:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/ta
So, summing up the ideas expressed so far, in the example case of a stop
sign on a two-ways way (not an all-ways stop), we have:
1- highway=stop+direction=forward node on the way to an intersection
- Advantages: simple, uses the well-known direction=* tag, easy for
routers to interpret
- Disadva
Javbw
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 9:42 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Also, presumably emergency spillways are mapped as areas, rather than
> lines, but they probably should have both, to have the water network and
> show the area. The one I am familiar with is really large
OSM has a lot of objects or
2017-03-23 10:30 GMT+01:00 Jean-Marc Liotier :
> As the "complex intersections" section of the highway=traffic_signals
> page describes a gradation of model complexity
> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%
> 3Dtraffic_signals#Complex_intersections),
> maybe coexistence is also possib
I suppose waterway=weir plus intermittent=yes would describe it, but I
don't think that's as good as a specific spillway tag.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> On 22 March 2017 at 16:56, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> > Weir does not seem appropriate for this type of thing. The
sent from a phone
> On 23 Mar 2017, at 01:41, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> And if not on an intersection node then it should be placed at the stop line.
> [2] I don’t think we are likely to have a stop line in the middle of an
> intersection. :)
think of a cycleway or a driveway for example. Maybe
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:57:44 +0100
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> generally it is unsafe to rely on a "direction" like forward or
> backward as tag on a node. Nodes do not have directions, and there is
> no relation from a node to a single way, the relation is from a way
> to a node and many ways
On 22 March 2017 at 18:53, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> You might use waterway as the main tag to prevent confusion with the
> top-level tag of water=*
>
> Either waterway=pool (TagInfo: 26 uses), or waterway=stream_pool, would be
> better than water=stream_pool. I still think it better to avoid using
16 matches
Mail list logo
