For trams/trolleys running along a street, is it necessary to have
railway=level_crossing at every cross street? It seems strange considering
that the entire street is one big level crossing.
--Roadsguy
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 4/4/2017 1:42 PM, Albert Pundt wrote:
For trams/trolleys running along a street, is it necessary to have
railway=level_crossing at every cross street? It seems strange
considering that the entire street is one big level crossing.
That was a question I had also, but looked at some places in
2017-04-04 19:56 GMT+02:00 Mike N :
> and as well the OSM model of "street as centerline" doesn't model the
> actual crossing well in some cases.
In the case of railway infrastructure (tram lines) those are often mapped
on their actual position (i.e. in a standard case of no oneway and the tra
On 4.4.2017 20:22, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
for example here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1668685086#map=19/52.52616/13.38725
I think Albert Pundt was asking about cases like this section of tram
tracks here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154321049. Should it be
mapped with two
On 4/4/2017 3:37 PM, Michal Fabík wrote:
I think Albert Pundt was asking about cases like this section of tram
tracks here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154321049. Should it be
mapped with two level crossings where it intersects with the northbound
lanes of the Friedrichstrasse and the southe
sent from a phone
> On 4 Apr 2017, at 22:13, Mike N wrote:
>
> A vehicle traveling either of those streets would indeed see that as a
> crossing - it does actually cross paths with the tram track.
+1, in the real world there are traffic lights to control this situation. I
think I would no
OK, then we'll take all of them away in Brussels, where I did this
extensively. The problem is that OsmAnd is constantly warning for railway
crossings now, so that is annoying.
Any suggestions for a tag? Or leave those crossings untagged? It's quite
obvious from the geometry there is a crossing an
On 4/4/2017 4:42 PM, Jo wrote:
OK, then we'll take all of them away in Brussels, where I did this
extensively. The problem is that OsmAnd is constantly warning for
railway crossings now, so that is annoying.
That sounds like a data consumer problem - option or never to warn if
crossing is tram
On 4/4/2017 4:42 PM, Jo wrote:
Any suggestions for a tag? Or leave those crossings untagged? It's quite
obvious from the geometry there is a crossing and quite logical that
it's level.
It would be convenient for data consumers to have the crossing
explicitly tagged without having to examine