I looked to see if 'byob' had been used but abbreviations just lead to
confusion.
althio's suggestion below seems appropriate. Unless another more
appropriate tag is suggested I'll use that & add it to the wiki.
DaveF.
On 10/04/2017 23:26, althio wrote:
I agree with Martin and I must insist:
> On Apr 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, althio wrote:
>
> My ideas are about:
> alcohol=yes/no/bring_your_own
> wine=yes/no/bring_your_own
+1
Perhaps alcohol:wine=* ?
Javbw.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetm
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 20:00 +0900, John Willis wrote:
> > On Apr 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, althio wrote:
> >
> > My ideas are about:
> > alcohol=yes/no/bring_your_own
> > wine=yes/no/bring_your_own
>
> +1
>
> Perhaps alcohol:wine=* ?
That is getting a little into listing what a restaurant sel
> On Apr 11, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> here is a term 'corkage' which is where a 'posh' restaurant allows you
> to take your own drinks,
Bottle service. They chill and serve your own wine to you. I think that should
be another value of:
Alcohol:wine=bottle_service
Usuall
Indeed. It's an Indian establishment & I'm pretty sure it's based on
religious grounds.
I think this tag needs to be a generic indicator of their services
rather than a subset of cuisine, so alcohol=yes/no/bring_your_own covers it.
DaveF
On 11/04/2017 12:46, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 201
But then some information will always be lost. If a restaurant is tagged
with alcohol=bring_your_own, can I still order a beer there? If it's tagged
with alcohol=yes, can I bring my own wine? Does alcohol=no mean "no alcohol
sold" or "no alcohol tolerated"?
Regards,
--
Michal Fabík
On Tue, Apr 1
2017-04-11 16:39 GMT+02:00 Michal Fabík :
> But then some information will always be lost. If a restaurant is tagged
> with alcohol=bring_your_own, can I still order a beer there? If it's tagged
> with alcohol=yes, can I bring my own wine? Does alcohol=no mean "no alcohol
> sold" or "no alcohol to
Hi
I'm confused.
I've a length of railway track that runs along part of a disused line.
It's not connected to the current network & run purely for tourism.
Both KeepRight & Osmose flag an error for 'railway=preserved' tags:
"This way uses deprecated tag 'railway=preserved'. Please use
"histor
Hi,
I'm not a railway expert, but like to comment anyway.
* Dave F [170411 23:41]:
> I've a length of railway track that runs along part of a disused line.
> It's not connected to the current network & run purely for tourism.
Well, the track IS operated, so the fact that it used to be part of
On 10 April 2017 23:27:36 CEST, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>2017-04-10 22:55 GMT+02:00 Michal Fabík :
>
>> Definition: use this tag for prominent tombstones
>
>
>
>I would not put "prominent" in the definition, otherwise the question
>will
>be: how can we tag a non-prominent tombstone?
>
>Che
Any active passenger railway is, among other usages, for tourism. So
usage=tourism seems to be redundant.
On 12 Apr 2017 00:15, "Wolfgang Zenker" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not a railway expert, but like to comment anyway.
>
> * Dave F [170411 23:41]:
> > I've a length of railway track that runs alon
11 matches
Mail list logo