Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

W dniu 07.08.2017 o 00:15, Lukas Sommer pisze: Both, Wisła (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/34392) and Czerwona (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269561538) have the classic stream order “1” just before they enter in the ocean. Likely, the former you would like to render on low zoom

Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

W dniu 06.08.2017 o 23:42, Colin Smale pisze: The problem I see with some of these stream models is that we are starting from the big rivers with no mapping of tributaries in many cases. As detail gets added, it looks like the ratings of all the downstream segments will need to be

Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

We have a hierarchy of "importance" for roads, why not for waterways as well? It's like we have nothing between motorway (river) and unclassified (stream). The problem I see with some of these stream models is that we are starting from the big rivers with no mapping of tributaries in many cases.

Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

W dniu 06.08.2017 o 23:19, Richard pisze: The width is fine for many small rivers where mapping riverbanks would be a nonsense and should be respected by the renderer. But what you ask for seems like tagging for the renderer. Most of the information is already there, either river width or the

Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:30:20PM +0200, Daniel Koć wrote: > W dniu 06.08.2017 o 13:32, Richard pisze: > >as of rendering, respecting river width and doing something reasonable > >with intermittent flows would be a great progress. > > What's the problem with intermittent flows? I'm not familiar

Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

W dniu 06.08.2017 o 19:07, Lukas Sommer pisze: [You have replied to me personally, but I guess it should go to the list] I would encourage to use only _one_ classification system. Otherwise, the tagging will be _very_ complex and using it for rendering nearly to impossible, because it will be

Re: [Tagging] service=access

You're probably right Gerd. I sometimes get too enthusiastic about adding tags to objects. The access tag is probably completely unnecessary. Still, I'm curious about why other mappers decided to use it. On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Gerd Petermann < gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

W dniu 06.08.2017 o 13:32, Richard pisze: as of rendering, respecting river width and doing something reasonable with intermittent flows would be a great progress. What's the problem with intermittent flows? I'm not familiar with water tagging. River width is a local property - it can vary

Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

(Wrong title sorry, here it is again) There is the CEMT tag, but I guess it's only useful for Europe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:CEMT Janko ned, 6. kol 2017. u 13:34 Richard napisao je: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:26:23AM +0200, Daniel Koć wrote: > > I

[Tagging] Odg: Rivers classification

There is the CEMT tag, but I guess it's only usefull for Europe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:CEMT Janko Pošiljatelj: Daniel Koć Poslano:6. kolovoza 2017. 11:28 Primatelj: Tagging@openstreetmap.org Predmet: [Tagging] Rivers classification I was thinking about better rendering rivers

Re: [Tagging] Rivers classification

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:26:23AM +0200, Daniel Koć wrote: > I was thinking about better rendering rivers on medium and low zoom levels > of osm-carto and I've found that we lack any classification of them - > anything bigger than stream is just a river. as of rendering, respecting river width

[Tagging] Rivers classification

I was thinking about better rendering rivers on medium and low zoom levels of osm-carto and I've found that we lack any classification of them - anything bigger than stream is just a river. There are no suitable tags defined: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driver and no

Re: [Tagging] service=access

Hi Dave, my understanding is that most hw=service are used to access a specific man_made object, so this tag seems to be superfluous to me. I would simply not use the service tag here. Gerd Von: Dave Swarthout Gesendet: Samstag,