Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Jo
Maybe recheck_itinerary_route_by would be a better tag. Then it can also be used when route relations are changed for roadworks that take more than say, a month and that cause changes in itinerary. Polyglot 2017-10-14 2:00 GMT+02:00 Andrew Davidson : > > > On 14/10/17 09:29, Jo wrote: > > >> S

Re: [Tagging] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-10-13 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
Warin, this is not an edit or a specific tag change proposal. That query was used as an example, suggested by the RU community on OSM RU Telegram channel (~270 people). I'm not a big fan of this communication medium, but that's how community is communicating. This is a tool that anyone can use for

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Andrew Davidson
On 14/10/17 09:29, Jo wrote: So the proposal is about the routes/itineraries that change, stops that aren't served anymore or new stops added to the lines. Are you sure about that? The proposed new tag is "timetable:valid_until". And the explanation starts of with: "every year timetable

Re: [Tagging] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-10-13 Thread Steve Doerr
Way to go! This looks like just the kind of productivity tool OSM is crying out for. Great idea, Yuri. Steve From: Yuri Astrakhan [mailto:yuriastrak...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 October 2017 22:25 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools ; OpenStreetMap talk mailing list Subject:

Re: [Tagging] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-10-13 Thread Warin
On 14-Oct-17 08:25 AM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service.  It allows users to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review each suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on each change if they think it's a good edit. For example, RU

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Jo
We don't have a scheme to tag the timetables and it would be quite hard to come up with one, involving many relations we don't want to maintain. Better to leave that part to GTFS. So the proposal is about the routes/itineraries that change, stops that aren't served anymore or new stops added to th

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Andrew Davidson
On 14 Oct. 2017 08:24, "Warin" <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally I don't enter timetable data, not something I expect the map to deal with. . This was something I wanted to clarify. Are we discussing changing routes (ie: the stops and the order they are served in) or changing timeta

[Tagging] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-10-13 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service. It allows users to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review each suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on each change if they think it's a good edit. For example, RU community wants to convert amenity=sanatorium ->

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Warin
On 14-Oct-17 04:11 AM, Michael Reichert wrote: Hi Andrew, Am 12.10.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Andrew Davidson: Do you want data users to consume this tag? Or is intended for other mappers to know when something needs to be updated? It is their decision what they consume and what not. The primary us

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Erkin Alp Güney
They may open any time. It is sometimes associated with political events. However, closures almost always happen on the start of the timetable period. Michael wrote: > Unfortunately, sometimes timetables or operators change not only in > December but also in June. New (railway) lines or stations a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Validity of Route Relations

2017-10-13 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi Andrew, Am 12.10.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Andrew Davidson: > Do you want data users to consume this tag? Or is intended for other > mappers to know when something needs to be updated? It is their decision what they consume and what not. The primary users are mappers and validators. But if data co