I'm trying to determine the ideal tagging scenario for the many oil fields
in the State of Alaska. The areas, which are large tracts of land leased
from the State of Alaska, are typically very large (50-100 sq miles) and
are mostly empty except for a few installations containing wellsites or
pumpin
It’s a re-forestation area, but the trees have all been teared down, so it’s
now scrub, but temporarily.
> Le 12 oct. 2017 à 11:20, Volker Schmidt a écrit :
>
> Is it (permanently) scrub or is it re-forestation area that is temporarily
> without trees?
>
>
>
> __
On 13/10/2017 22:25, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service. It allows
users to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review
each suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on each change if they
think it's a good edit.
For example, RU co
On 14/10/17 18:53, Michael Reichert wrote:
If recheck_itinerary_route_by= reduces the confusion (see email by
Andrew) and nobody opposes on this mailing list (or a parallel
discussion), I will change the proposed tag.
It does make it much clearer that the tag is intended for the data
maint
Hi,
Am 2017-10-14 um 06:49 schrieb Jo:
> Maybe
>
> recheck_itinerary_route_by
>
> would be a better tag. Then it can also be used when route relations are
> changed for roadworks that take more than say, a month and that cause
> changes in itinerary.
If recheck_itinerary_route_by= reduces the c
Hi,
Am 2017-10-14 um 00:29 schrieb Jo:
> 2017-10-13 23:59 GMT+02:00 Andrew Davidson :
> We don't have a scheme to tag the timetables and it would be quite hard to
> come up with one, involving many relations we don't want to maintain.
> Better to leave that part to GTFS.
>
> So the proposal is ab
Hi Warin,
Am 2017-10-13 um 23:22 schrieb Warin:
> On 14-Oct-17 04:11 AM, Michael Reichert wrote:
>> end_date=* is used on disused objects or objects whose last day of
>> operation/service is known. Common examples are disused railway tracks
>> or shops which announced the last day they will be ope
