Re: [Tagging] New tag for major recipient postcodes

2017-12-22 Thread Rainer
Thinking about contact:addr:*, that sounds like a good idea. So it would be contact:addr:postcode_major_recipient Advantage is that it describes the purpose to be used for contacting the company, authority, hospital or whatever POI, but not e.g. for navigation, because it doesn't have a geogra

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 3))

2017-12-22 Thread Moritz
Hi François, Am 2017-12-20 19:00, schrieb François Lacombe: 2017-12-20 12:21 GMT+01:00 Moritz : I disagree, that would make the proposal useless. Then only wrench and check_date would be left. That wasn't my point. pump=yes can stay in the proposal I misunderstood that. But pumps taggin

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Fire Hydrant Extensions (part 3))

2017-12-22 Thread Moritz
Hi Viking, Am 2017-12-21 10:20, schrieb Viking: Hi all. First of all I invite to put comments also on discussion page [0], because it remains a trace useful for voting decisions. We don't need a detailed description for pumps, we need to know only if there is a pump connected (or inside) the w