[Tagging] roundtrip

What is the use of the key:roundtrip? Explanations just say roundtrip =yes/no (optional) Use roundtrip=no to indicate that a route goes from A to B. Use roundtrip=yes to indicate that the start and finish of the route are at the same location

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

If I understand this proposal right, the goal of this tag is to provide more specific information for the general likelihood of whether a water feature (only rivers?) exists: when it comes and goes every days. This sounds like there are two pieces of information that are desirable to map: - What

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

That is actually pretty strongly dependant on El Nino: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/updates/articles/a008-el-nino-and-australia.shtml The shift in rainfall away from the western Pacific, associated with El Niño, means that Australian rainfall is usually reduced through winter–spring,

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

Thanks Graeme On 25 May 2018 at 13:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd not put a season on any of them .. too variable for me to determine a > season. > > & that's the killer. In Queensland, summer is supposed to be wet & winter dry, but something like 6 years out of the last 12,

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

To me the difference between ephemeral and intermittent is the duration of the water flow/presence. To me Lake Eyre is intermittent. The Fink Rv. is ephemeral. The Cooper etc I don't know enough to say ephemeral.. so I'd use intermittent. I'd not put a season on any of them .. too variable for

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

Not an OSM / mapping item as such, but on the subject of intermittent / ephemeral waterways, I thought people may be interested in this? http://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/programs/sa-country-hour/2018-05-24/lake-eyre-fills-water-tourists-feral-animals/9792352 So how do you map that lot? :-)

Re: [Tagging] highway=service // public road?

> On May 25, 2018, at 2:29 AM, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Interestingly the key:highway wiki page lists unclassified as > the lowest classification of a road: That’s weird - since service=alley seems to be the lowest class, being service and all - yet "alley” is a public road. I

Re: [Tagging] highway=service // public road?

sent from a phone > On 24. May 2018, at 19:29, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Interestingly the key:highway wiki page lists unclassified as > the lowest classification of a road: > >"The least most important through roads in a country's system" it actually says “through road”,

Re: [Tagging] highway=service // public road?

sent from a phone > On 24. May 2018, at 12:07, Georg Feddern wrote: > > The mapping differentiation in unclassified (mostly connecting roads), > service without service=* (mostly destination roads) what is a “destination road”? > and track (for - due to history -

[Tagging] how to tag place where horse-drawn carriages wait for tourists?

It is quite typical tourism attraction - tourist may rent carriage for a trip. In many cases there are designated points where carriages wait for tourists wishing to rent them. Is there a tag to mark them? I encountered some maked tourism=attraction nodes with just names and no main key and I

Re: [Tagging] highway=service // public road?

Florian, I would agree with you. Posting the Australian pictures on the wiki would attract a few more opinions. Somebody dare? Yves Le 24 mai 2018 19:29:03 GMT+02:00, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:14:34PM +1000, Andrew Harvey wrote: >> On 23 May 2018 at

Re: [Tagging] 3d-tagging

Stefan, you can map a tunnel in the "Simple 3D" scheme by adding a "min_height=x" tag on the building:part that forms the top of the tunnel. I.e., if the tunnel opening is 8 meters high and the top of the castle wall is 4 meters above that, tag that building:part with height=12 and

Re: [Tagging] highway=service // public road?

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:14:34PM +1000, Andrew Harvey wrote: > On 23 May 2018 at 23:09, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service#values > > > > Looking at the values only 10% of the service=* are alley. > > > > What about highway=service without

Re: [Tagging] 3d-tagging

On 24.05.2018 13:25, Stefan K. wrote: Sorry, more information needed :) Okay, i found https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings ... I'm right now asking because i am wondering if there is a somehow "official" one. "Official" is what is used by data consumers - this is the case

Re: [Tagging] 3d-tagging

Sorry, more information needed :) Okay, i found https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings and the german https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OSM-4D I'm right now asking because i am wondering if there is a somehow "official" one. I will try to tag a castle. I intend to use

Re: [Tagging] 3d-tagging

Hello, This one is the common way to do 3D tagging on OSM : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings It is already used by several renderers (F4Map, OSM2World...), all supported software is listed in the page. Regards, Adrien. Le 24/05/2018 à 11:01, Stefan K. a écrit : I

Re: [Tagging] highway=service // public road?

On 23 May 2018 at 23:09, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service#values > > Looking at the values only 10% of the service=* are alley. > > What about highway=service without service=* ? > A lot of these are simply a lower classification than

Re: [Tagging] highway=service // public road?

Am 23.05.2018 um 22:33 schrieb Greg Troxel: Florian Lohoff writes: I now see increasing usage of service roads as a category below unclassified. People tagging "smaller roads" in the countryside as a service roads. I think this is basically wrong tagging. I find this a little

Re: [Tagging] 3d-tagging

Which one? Link? There were a few. On 24 May 2018, at 10:05, "Stefan K." wrote: I found a wiki for 3d-tagging, is that a proposal? Can i tag using theses suggestet tags? Unfortunately i could not find a 3d-mailinglist so i thought i mayb try it here. The 3d section in the

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Refugee Camp Boundaries

Hi everyone, We have worked on a tagging proposal for mapping refugee settlement and camp boundaries and we would like to get your comments. At the moment, refugee camp/settlement tagging is applied inconsistently, and the use of the same boundaries and admin_levels as are used at the national

[Tagging] 3d-tagging

I found a wiki for 3d-tagging, is that a proposal? Can i tag using theses suggestet tags? Unfortunately i could not find a 3d-mailinglist so i thought i mayb try it here. The 3d section in the forum seems not to populated unfortunately, i would prefer it over the mailing-list :( Greetings

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

The way I interpret it: The default state (no tags) is: water always flows The seasonal, intermittent and ephemeral tags says For these times, the explicit state is: the water always flows, is intermittent, or is ephemeral For all other times, the default state is: the water

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

24. May 2018 06:39 by osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au : > > If I’ve understood it correctly, I would tag that as: > >   > > seasonal=winter,spring,autumn > > ephemeral=summer > Yes, it would work.

Re: [Tagging] opening_hours:sign=no - RFC

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:23:43 +1000 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Most websites have some copyright thing .. that makes some nervous. > I usually only tag things that interest me, and stuff I like to > support. In the United States, at least, opening hours are uncopyrightable. You can

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

If I’ve understood it correctly, I would tag that as: seasonal=winter,spring,autumn ephemeral=summer From: Mateusz Konieczny Sent: Thursday, 24 May 2018 16:28 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Cc:

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

22. May 2018 22:53 by 61sundow...@gmail.com : > Is that clear? Do how easiest that is - flowing during winter, spring, autumn - generally not flowing during summer but with possible ephemeral flows should be tagged?