Hi,
On 07/05/2018 12:59 AM, Jmapb wrote:
> So I was considering changing them to
> shop=fortune_teller.
But doesn't the average psychic offer more than just fortune telling?
Relationship counselling, crime detection, treasure hunting, mind
reading, supernatural business consulting...
I would ha
On 7/4/2018 7:08 PM, Warin wrote:
Shops sell physical objects e.g. bread, vegetables, paper.
These .. people .. don't sell physical objects .. so they are not a
shop. There are, at best, an office.
I think of them as shops in the same sense as shop=hairdresser. office
seems a bit.. off. I
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:59 PM, Jmapb wrote:
>
> This reminds me of something I've been meaning to ask the list... I've got
> a lot of psychics in the area. I've been tagging them shop=psychic because
> that's what the signs say, but I don't really feel OSM ought to be
> endorsing unverifiable c
On 05/07/18 08:59, Jmapb wrote:
On 7/4/2018 4:29 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
Seems OK to me. They're selling after-life insurance. Pay your
tithe or put money on the collection plate and you
go to heaven. And there's a money-back guarantee: if you don't go to
heaven, or there's no afterlife at all
On 7/4/2018 4:29 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
Seems OK to me. They're selling after-life insurance. Pay your tithe
or put money on the collection plate and you
go to heaven. And there's a money-back guarantee: if you don't go to
heaven, or there's no afterlife at all, simply
return and make a complai
On 05/07/18 08:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 4. Jul 2018, at 22:50, marc marc wrote:
but I never see a building having a "public typology or style".
e.g. courthouses, townhalls, office buildings for the public administration,
etc.
Just as some miss tag an area of t
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2018, at 22:50, marc marc wrote:
>
> but I never see a building having a "public typology or style".
e.g. courthouses, townhalls, office buildings for the public administration,
etc.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@o
Good evening everybody
As power mapping goes on in France, we use to find some power substation in
street cabinets like in many countries.
Those cabinets often host a single transformer to step down voltage for
households (and its a power substation since there are switches with the
transformer in
Le 04. 07. 18 à 20:04, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> You can interpret building=public as a building erected for the public
> administration
why a building was erected is not describing what it look like.
some "public" building look like as a building=residential or house,
or building=appartem
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:16 PM, Jmapb wrote:
> I'd suggest something like access=customers, but that comes off as cheeky
> when you're talking about religion.
>
Seems OK to me. They're selling after-life insurance. Pay your tithe or
put money on the collection plate and you
go to heaven. And
I'd suggest something like access=customers, but that comes off as
cheeky when you're talking about religion. So maybe access=adherents?
J
On 6/29/2018 3:55 PM, Erkin Alp Güney wrote:
islam=only.
29-06-2018 21:35 tarihinde Mateusz Konieczny yazdı:
I thought about it but it is not clear that
On 7/4/2018 2:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it is not necessarily an outlier. You can interpret building=public as a
building erected for the public administration, regardless of current use.
You can. But as building "typology" goes it's pretty vague; anything
from a Roman forum to a prefa
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2018, at 17:32, Jmapb wrote:
>
> But it's definitely an outlier.
it is not necessarily an outlier. You can interpret building=public as a
building erected for the public administration, regardless of current use.
Cheers,
Martin
_
On 7/4/2018 10:47 AM, César Martínez Izquierdo wrote:
The exception that I've seen is building=public -- this seems most often
to indicate the current use rather than the style.
it's why it's depreciated a long time ago.
Is it? It's never been removed from the wiki. But it's definitely an
I checked my own tagging and found that I (mostly) used
building=yes (which I forgot to include in my earlier post)
historic=manor
manor:type=venetian_villa
I guess that the tagging
building=manor
historic=yes
manor:type=venetian_villa
would alaso be OK or even better.
Replace venetian_villa with
Thanks for all the suggestions.
My conclusion is that "manor" is suitable in this case as the value of
the historic tag.
I understand it should also be used on the building tag, although this
value it is not listed on Wiki.
Therefore, following the examples previously provided, I'd use:
- For a
Le 04. 07. 18 à 15:51, Jmapb a écrit :
> On 7/4/2018 7:23 AM, marc marc wrote:
>
>> Le 04. 07. 18 à 12:34, César Martínez Izquierdo a écrit :
>>> I think that the best way is to tag their current use (e.g.
>>> building=hotel
>> the building tag is what the building look like
>> so building=castel
On 7/4/2018 7:23 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 04. 07. 18 à 12:34, César Martínez Izquierdo a écrit :
I think that the best way is to tag their current use (e.g.
building=hotel
the building tag is what the building look like
so building=castel for exemple
the current use of a bulding is building:us
you should discuss this on talk-it as well.
You can find more information here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
Cheers,
Martin
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2018, at 14:09, Carmine Massarelli
> wrote:
>
> Dear,
> I would like to contribute to Osm updating all the opening time of
Dear,
I would like to contribute to Osm updating all the opening time of
fuel:cng=yes of Italy.
Is it possible to do it without tagging every single point station via
openstreetmap editor?
CaMa
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
On Wednesday 04 July 2018, César Martínez Izquierdo wrote:
>
> I wonder if option 1 (manor) is too specific to UK or it can be
> applied also to these kind of building.
>
> OSM wiki states: "The manor tag is intended only for representative
> buildings that are in the same time the administrative c
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:34 AM, César Martínez Izquierdo <
cesar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wonder the best way to tag Spanish historic farmhouses ("masías"
> [1], "caseríos" [2] "cortijos", "pazos", etc), since I find no proper
> value of "historic" for them.
>
I suggest you contact the creato
Le 04. 07. 18 à 12:34, César Martínez Izquierdo a écrit :
> I think that the best way is to tag their current use (e.g.
> building=hotel
the building tag is what the building look like
so building=castel for exemple
the current use of a bulding is building:use
so for exemple building:use=resident
In the Veneto region of Italy there are about 300 Venetian Villas tagged as
"historic=manor" plus "manor:type=venetian_villa" [1]
This could be a model, as the historic function of those villas was most
likely very similar to the ones listed in your post. [2]
[1] http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/A3H
[2]
Search in this list for "[Tagging] Manor tagging" around march 14th.
The manor is the area around the house (la finca)
The manor house it the house itself.
Yours,
José Moya
El 4/7/2018 12:36 PM, "César Martínez Izquierdo"
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder the best way to tag Spanish historic farmhous
Hi,
I wonder the best way to tag Spanish historic farmhouses ("masías"
[1], "caseríos" [2] "cortijos", "pazos", etc), since I find no proper
value of "historic" for them.
They are prominent buildings that are spread all over the country,
dating from at least the XVII century and in some cases hav
26 matches
Mail list logo
