On 12/08/19 15:38, Peter Elderson wrote:
That would be for the Australian mapping community to decide, to
document and to implement.
There is already some guidance for Australian roads
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Road_Tagging
And not to forget the East A
That would be for the Australian mapping community to decide, to document and
to implement.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 11 aug. 2019 om 23:08 heeft Graeme Fitzpatrick het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 05:04, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:35 PM Peter
In Spain we have big problems, discussions and arguments with that
question. Last month, a French user complained about the state of a
"Nacional" (Country Main Road) classified in OSM as trunk.
These problems have one main reason. Here in Spain, in some places, there
are six degrees of public admin
On 12/08/19 09:05, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I believe this is incapacitating the wider community and creating a
context where it becomes almost impossible for an ordinary mapper to
make even a small modification to these parts in the wiki.
I don't think making a change is a problem. The
12 Aug 2019, 01:05 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
> Is it now unavoidable that the info box content on tag definition pages in
> the wiki comes from the database?
>
It is avoidable, just specify values in the template.
I just reverted edit that for some unexplained reason damaged wiki page.
See
Is it now unavoidable that the info box content on tag definition pages in the
wiki comes from the database? Is there consensus that the higher complexity to
edit it is less important than the features we gain from it?
E.g. here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge
I find
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 22:10, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> In Australia, it's not uncommon for a Primary (& in some cases, Trunk!)
> road to be a single lane dirt road!, & it would be nice to be able to show
> them with the importance that they are to local residents of that area.
>
There appea
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 05:04, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:35 PM Peter Elderson
> wrote:
>
>> I'm sure the hierarchy
>> trunk/primary/secondary/tertiary//residential with a side
>> of service types is general enough that all countries can map their own
>> system to it. I feel
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:35 PM Peter Elderson wrote:
> I'm sure the hierarchy
> trunk/primary/secondary/tertiary//residential with a side
> of service types is general enough that all countries can map their own
> system to it. I feel no need to force any country's own system upon any
> other co
I'm sure the hierarchy
trunk/primary/secondary/tertiary//residential with a side
of service types is general enough that all countries can map their own
system to it. I feel no need to force any country's own system upon any
other country, or to make it the same all over the world.
If mapping tool
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 3:26 AM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> trunk - connects cities to cities ("National Roads")
> primary - connects a town to a city or another town
> secondary - connects a village to a town/city or another village
> tertiary - connects a hamlet to a village/town or another hamle
11 matches
Mail list logo
