Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

2020-03-07 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
> 2. People with a preference for the old tags see that as an excuse to keep > using them It's openstreetmap, "any tags you like" etc. - you have to reach local consensus to change tags. Voting on a proposal does not avoid this step, you will have to convince people that the new way is better.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

2020-03-07 Thread John Doe
08-Mar-2020 03:56:45 Joseph Eisenberg : > > > routes without fixed stops can easily be represented using only via points > > and stop positions > > > > I think you mean "bus stops" (or railway platforms), not > "public_transport=stop_position", since those nodes are usually > unnecessary, and a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

2020-03-07 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
> routes without fixed stops can easily be represented using only via points > and stop positions I think you mean "bus stops" (or railway platforms), not "public_transport=stop_position", since those nodes are usually unnecessary, and are not added by most mappers for bus routes. Routing apps ca

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

2020-03-07 Thread John Doe
As mentioned in the Caveats section of the proposal, hail and ride _has_ been in our thoughts. 🙂 (Buses operated by NMRTC in Noida are all hail and ride, and so are all share autos in Delhi, making it quite important for me personally.) My idea, initially, was to have this proposal serve as an

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

2020-03-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 02:30, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: However, there are also public transit services where the bus can stop > anywhere along the route. This is the most common type of bus here in > Indonesia. In this case there are no fixed stops except for the 2 end > points, but the minibus fol

Re: [Tagging] Amenity=fountain

2020-03-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 7. Mar 2020, at 08:48, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The only real difference to me is the inclusion of historical. > I don't see why a fountain that is 'historical' does not also fit into one, > or more, of the other classes in particular cultural? I had s

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

2020-03-07 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Phake Nick wrote: > First of all, I don't think there are any existing routing engines > for trains on rail or bus or minibuses on street Sure there are. https://github.com/geofabrik/OpenRailRouting https://github.com/railnova/osrm-train-profile https://signal.eu.org/osm/ https://github.com/Proj

Re: [Tagging] Amenity=fountain

2020-03-07 Thread European Water Project
Not wise to get into an edit war. > Agree 100% ! Collegiality and commonality of purpose should be strived > for. On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 08:48 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/3/20 6:34 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > There's a star on the menu bar on top of the wiki page, jus