[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - bureau_de_change=yes

Hello all.I propose you a feature to indicate the bank have the currency exchange service inside. It is located on wiki pagehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bureau_de_change%3Dyes Please check. Regards,Alexander. ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

Jun 3, 2020, 07:03 by mark+...@carnildo.com: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:39:14 +0200 (CEST) > Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > >> Jun 2, 2020, 03:52 by c933...@gmail.com: >> >> > >> > >> > 在 2020年6月2日週二 09:26，Warin <> 61sundow...@gmail.com> > 寫道： >> > >> >> On 30/5/20 12:48 am, Volker Schmi

[Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Recreational route relation roles

Voting has started! Voting is open till 2020-06-17. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles The proposal will not change during voting. I will answer clarifying questions. Comments, even if it's just about wording or examples and doesn't change the

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

Mark, can you tell us the place? The photo seems to show a US city, but which one? Even at thrìe small scale of the image I can see several traces that look very much like ex-railway tracks (it's easy in US cities as they do not follow the block structure). Please don't forget that I am not sayin

Re: [Tagging] Mapping Ecomuseum

I collected some data about one particular ecomuseum, the “Ecomuseo della resistenza” [1]. The ecomuseum is composed of 8 different municipalities (Aprica, Corteno Golgi [2], Edolo, Monno, Tirano, Villa di Tirano, Sonico e Malonno), so I will create a multipoligon and map it as: type = boundary

Re: [Tagging] Mapping Ecomuseum

It would be interesting to test if some existing boundary value means the same.https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/boundary#valuesMaybe "boundary=traditional" tag is mostly used in the same sense?Best regards,Alexey  03.06.2020, 15:05, "Lorenzo Stucchi" :I collected some data about one particula

[Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

Another user would like to add the tag man_made=spoil_heap to Map Features: "The tag man_made = spoil_heap is used to map a spoil heap or Spoil tip , a pile or piles of waste rock removed during mining."

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 23:56, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > The one issue is whether it is clearly different than landuse=landfill. > Different. Spoil heaps are, as the Wikipedia article documents, heaps. Tips. Piles. Piles of non-degradable mining waste. Rock. Rubble. You pile them up and th

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

Or Australia! & is there any reason *not* to add things to the map features page? Thanks Graeme ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 01:00, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > & is there any reason *not* to add things to the map features page? > Things that are rarely mapped are not good candidates for a page listing things that are frequently mapped. -- Paul ___ T

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

> > >> >> & is there any reason *not* to add things to the map features page? >> > > Things that are rarely mapped are not good candidates for a page listing > things that are frequently mapped. > > Right now there are 105 documented tags with the key "man_made:", and only 50 of these are listed on

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

sent from a phone > On 4. Jun 2020, at 02:29, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > The Map Features page is already quite long and unwieldy, so it is reasonable > to limit how many more tags are added. yes, it is already so long, it really doesn’t matter so much whether you add another item or not,

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

Jun 4, 2020, 02:37 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 4. Jun 2020, at 02:29, Joseph Eisenberg >> wrote: >> >> The Map Features page is already quite long and unwieldy, so it is >> reasonable to limit how many more tags are added. >> > > > yes, it is already so long, i

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 20:40, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: (about Map Features wiki page) > In its current state it is still barely usable. Personally I've given up on the current Map Features page and would rather use the wiki search or taginfo search than wait for it to load and probably

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

sent from a phone > On 4. Jun 2020, at 02:41, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > > All features with 50+ uses? It would probably not load within minute in a > typical browser. you’re right, make it 500 > > In its current state it is still barely usable. +1 Cheers Martin _

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

On 2/6/20 9:44 pm, Paul Allen wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 12:23, Volker Schmidt > wrote: Anyway the examples you find in OSM are few and in all cases I know the completely erased bits are a tiny part of the overall ex-railway. There are three ex-railways

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

Yep, there's a lot on it, & it takes a while to open. But there's also no reason not to make use of it! The people on this list are, I would say, well & truly towards the more experienced end of the OSM spectrum, so you may not use it (although I still do when I can't remember exactly what I want

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

> On Jun 3, 2020, at 4:19 PM, Paul Allen wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 23:56, Joseph Eisenberg > wrote: > > The one issue is whether it is clearly different than landuse=landfill. > > Different. > > Spoil heaps are, as the Wikipedia article documents, h

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

Graeme is right, plus it's a curated list on the wiki, this had its advantages! Maybe splitting it in 'main' (50k uses) and 'extended' may help. Yves ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:24:45 +0200 (CEST) Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > Jun 3, 2020, 07:03 by mark+...@carnildo.com: > > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:39:14 +0200 (CEST) > > Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > > > >> Jun 2, 2020, 03:52 by c933...@gmail.com: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > 在

Re: [Tagging] Adding man_made=spoil_heap to the Map Features page?

> On Jun 3, 2020, at 5:45 PM, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 20:40, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > (about Map Features wiki page) >> In its current state it is still barely usable. > > Personally I've given up on the current Map Features page and would > rather use

Re: [Tagging] Mapping Ecomuseum

Thanks for the suggestion. I saw that tradition is madly used with for describe an historical area with some characteristics. So it is not so related with this case. I check also all the other 500 values and no one is related with the eco museum. Best, Lorenzo Il giorno 3 giu 2020, alle ore 19