I dont know about the USA, but in British English, "portable" means that it can
be carried.
If you can drink it, it is "potable".
>Message: 5
>Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 01:57:56 +0300
>From: 80hnhtv4a...@bk.ru
>To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>
>Subject: Re: [Tagging] taggin
sent from a phone
> On 7. Sep 2020, at 01:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Because I want to use drinking_water=yes and something indicating that there
> is strong
> reason to believe that water is drinkable
do I understand you correctly that in your interpretation
drinking
potable, and non potable, as in water lines separated in Florida.
>Sunday, September 6, 2020 7:01 PM -05:00 from Philip Barnes
>:
>
>On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 01:57 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
>> in the united states we say (portable)
>I suspect the US word is potable, same as GB.
On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 01:57 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
> in the united states we say (portable)
I suspect the US word is potable, same as GB.
Phil (trigpoint)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetm
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Sep 7, 2020, 00:52 by dieterdre...@gmail.com
>
> why not use
> drinking_water=yes for these?
>
> Because I want to use drinking_water=yes and something indicating that
> there is strong
> reason to b
Sep 7, 2020, 00:52 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 6. Sep 2020, at 21:04, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
>> wrote:
>>
>> That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which currently is described as
>> including
>> places where status is not explicitly signed but is known
in the united states we say (portable)
>Sunday, September 6, 2020 5:52 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer
>:
>
>
>
>sent from a phone
>
>> On 6. Sep 2020, at 21:04, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
>> tagging@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>
>> That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which cur
sent from a phone
> On 6. Sep 2020, at 21:04, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which currently is described as
> including
> places where status is not explicitly signed but is known to be good
> (examples
> may include water fountains setu
House numbers are also exhaustively complete in The Netherlands.
Jo
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020, 22:46 Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
> Martin Koppenhoefer:
> >
> >
> > sent from a phone
> >
> >> On 5. Sep 2020, at 16:43, ben.ki...@mail.de wrote:
> >>
> >> Which are the world regions OSM data is better i
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 05:11, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> natural=wetland wetland=reedbed area within natural=water area?
>
> JOSM complains about this ("water area within water area") but
> such tagging seems fine to me.
>
That should be fine.
Have done si
natural=wetland wetland=reedbed area within natural=water area?
JOSM complains about this ("water area within water area") but
such tagging seems fine to me.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844830821
for an example
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging
That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which currently is described as
including
places where status is not explicitly signed but is known to be good (examples
may include water fountains setup and maintained by city).
Sep 6, 2020, 20:39 by europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com:
> if drinking_water:
if drinking_water:legal is about the content of a sign, I would prefer
Paul‘s suggestion:
drinking_water:legal=unsigned
+1
I also agree that this is a good suggestion
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 20:34, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 6. Sep 2020, at 16:21, Mateusz Koniecz
sent from a phone
> On 6. Sep 2020, at 16:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> I will use drinking_water:legal=unknown
if drinking_water:legal is about the content of a sign, I would prefer Paul‘s
suggestion:
drinking_water:legal=unsigned
sent from a phone
> On 6. Sep 2020, at 16:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> may be also unsigned, but it may be clearly coming from drinkable tap water
the water could be contaminated at the end of it’s journey (conduits), and not
be suggested to drink although the general tap
Sep 6, 2020, 15:51 by pla16...@gmail.com:
> On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 14:17, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>>
>> drinking_water:signed=no ?
>>
>
> Ambiguous. It might have a sign that says nothing about the legality.
>
> drinking_water:legal=unsigned?
>
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 14:17, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> drinking_water:signed=no ?
>
Ambiguous. It might have a sign that says nothing about the legality.
drinking_water:legal=unsigned?
drinking_water:legal=unknown?
--
Paul
__
We have drinking_water:legal=yes for water that is officially drinkable,
we have drinking_water:legal=no for water signed as not drinkable.
Do we have tag for water sources (amenity=drinking_water, drinking_water=yes)
that are neither officially or signably drinkable nor with "not drinkable sign"?
18 matches
Mail list logo
