[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Special Economic Zones

A special economic zone (SEZ) is an area in which the business and trade laws are different from the rest of the country. Only a small number of these areas are mapped so far, however, estimates put the total number of SEZ worldwide at between 2,700 and 10,000. The proposed tagging for these area

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 at 15:51, Jeroen Hoek wrote: > On 24-10-2020 15:58, Paul Allen wrote: > > I don't see any valid reason for wanting to de-emphasize them and you > > do not attempt to provide one. Maybe there is a valid reason but I > > don't see it. > > Thanks for the feedback; we'll clarify

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 at 15:25, Janko Mihelić wrote: > > These two variants are mapping for the renderer, > Incorrect. They are approximations to reality. Everything we map is an approximation to reality, one way or another, because the map is a representation. That they happen to render in a w

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

The two methods: 1. Tagging on the way line. When a road, highway=* 2. Tagging a polygon. When a road, area:highway=* Will always be used next to each other. We have to take that into account. New mappers, see a parking plot/space and want to draw that in, that is logical behaviour. It is obvi

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] User deleting many roads in Brazil

Erick de Oliveira Leal: Good morning, a user in Brasil is deleting many roads, I think all of its changeset need to be reverted. Could you give us an English summary of the discussion on the changesets. Examples of bad changesets: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92345676

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

On 24-10-2020 16:22, Janko Mihelić wrote: > These two variants are mapping for the renderer, and both add false > data. The first one extends the parking over half the road. The second > creates a service road area over half the road. There is no service road > area there, you are just trying to co

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

On 24-10-2020 15:58, Paul Allen wrote: > I don't see any valid reason for wanting to de-emphasize them and you > do not attempt to provide one. Maybe there is a valid reason but I > don't see it. Thanks for the feedback; we'll clarify that point. From the proposal: > Furthermore, this type of pa

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

On 24-10-2020 15:58, Paul Allen wrote: > What you haven't convinced me of is that it isn't amenity=parking. > By any rational definition it is.  I know of off-carriageway parking > which is controlled by a county council and has a ticket > machine.  The county council lists it as a car park, one >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

sub, 24. lis 2020. u 15:14 Paul Allen napisao je: > Variant 1. Extend the parking area out to the roat it is on. Pretty much > as > you handled the lay-by example. As far as rendering goes, where most > carto renders the road on top of the parking area, it represents things > as a way that matc

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 at 14:35, Jeroen Hoek wrote: > On 24-10-2020 15:11, Paul Allen wrote: > > As rendered it appears you need a skyhook or > > a cargo helicopter to park. Not good. You're probably as unhappy with > that > > method of tagging as I am. > > True, but the same goes for lots of poin

[Tagging] Proposal for admission=* tag

Here is my proposal on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Admission In short, we don't have any way to connect places that need a ticket for entrance, with the place that sells those tickets. Usually those places are close together, but sometimes they are not. In those

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

On 24-10-2020 15:11, Paul Allen wrote: > As rendered it appears you need a skyhook or > a cargo helicopter to park.  Not good.  You're probably as unhappy with that > method of tagging as I am. True, but the same goes for lots of points-of-interests and other mapped parts of the urban landscape; e

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 at 12:42, Supaplex wrote: I would like to invite you to discuss a proposal for "parking = > street_side" for areas suitable or designated for parking, which are > directly adjacent to the carriageway of a road and can be reached directly > from the roadway without having to us

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

I support parking=street_side, this is a much needed tag. Janko ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=street_side

Hey all, I would like to invite you to discuss a proposal for "parking = street_side" for areas suitable or designated for parking, which are directly adjacent to the carriageway of a road and can be reached directly from the roadway without having to use an access way: https://wiki.openstreetmap.

Re: [Tagging] Parking fee only after some time period

Overall - it seems that we reached some consensus here and there is no need for proposal, although this thread got lengthy. Please let me know in next couple of days if anyone thinks proposal would be better way. Jan - I wanted to use "maxstay" as it is more common than "stay" today. But, what